Supplementary file 5. Pairwise genetic distance for our data set obtained using MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1157.3149


Title: fasta file
Description
  Analysis ====================
    Analysis                                  = ====================
       Scope                                  = Pairs of taxa
    Estimate Variance                         = ====================
       Variance Estimation Method             = None
    Substitution Model                        = ====================
       Substitutions Type                     = Nucleotide
       Model/Method                           = Jukes-Cantor model
       Substitutions to Include               = All
    Rates and Patterns                        = ====================
       Rates among Sites                      = Gamma Distributed (G)
          Gamma Parameter                     = 1.00
       Pattern among Lineages                 = Same (Homogeneous)
    Data Subset to Use                        = ====================
       Gaps/Missing Data Treatment            = Pairwise deletion
       Select Codon Positions                 = 1st,2nd,3rd,Non-Coding
  No. of Sites:2852
  d:Estimate

[ 1] #Neoantistea_quelpartensis_{Antistea+Neontist}
[ 2] #Antistea_brunnea_{Antistea+Neontist}
[ 3] #Neoantistea_agilis_{Antistea+Neontist}
[ 4] #Cybaeus_morosus_{Cybaeidae}
[ 5] #Calymmaria_sp01_{Cybaeidae}
[ 6] #Cryphoeca_exlineae_{Cybaeidae}
[ 7] #Cybaeolus_pusillus_{Cybaeolus}
[ 8] #Cybaeolus_cf_rastellus_{Cybaeolus}
[ 9] #Hahnia_ononidum_{Hahnia_1}
[10] #Hahnia_spZZ2016_China_{Hahnia_1}
[11] #Hahnia_clathrata_{Hahnia_1}
[12] #Hahnia_zhejiangensis_{Hahnia_1}
[13] #Hahnia_nava_{Hahnia_1}
[14] #Hahnia_cinerea_{Hahnia_1}
[15] #Hahnia_ngai_{Hahnia_2}
[16] #Hahnia_saccata_{Hahnia_2}
[17] #Hexamatia_seekhaow_{Hexamatia}
[18] #Agelena_labyrinthica_{outgroup}

[         1      2      3      4      5      6      7      8      9     10     11     12     13     14     15     16     17     18 ]
[ 1]         
[ 2]  0.0805        
[ 3]  0.0728 0.1002        
[ 4]  0.1845 0.1802 0.1917        
[ 5]  0.1788 0.1849 0.1868 0.0921        
[ 6]  0.1756 0.1851 0.1948 0.1119 0.1173        
[ 7]  0.1597 0.1674 0.1715 0.1836 0.1715 0.1618        
[ 8]  0.1461 0.1475 0.1576 0.1671 0.1590 0.1482 0.0542        
[ 9]  0.1803 0.2008 0.1900 0.1918 0.1905 0.1839 0.1719 0.1595        
[10]  0.3239 0.3185 0.3286 0.3249 0.3241 0.3193 0.3663 0.2793 0.2037        
[11]  0.2756 0.2839 0.2510 0.2688 0.2633 0.2904 0.3060 0.2183 0.1588 0.1813        
[12]  0.1789 0.1832 0.1850 0.2003 0.1970 0.1861 0.1761 0.1624 0.1069 0.1864 0.1717        
[13]  0.1134 0.1224 0.1126 0.1228 0.1175 0.1112 0.0571 0.0932 0.0909 0.2386 0.1832 0.0930        
[14]  0.1876 0.1823 0.1883 0.1849 0.1814 0.1715 0.1583 0.1553 0.0980 0.1953 0.1597 0.1049 0.0858        
[15]  0.1612 0.1703 0.1702 0.1760 0.1750 0.1782 0.1709 0.1491 0.1714 0.2821 0.2239 0.1842 0.1226 0.1761        
[16]  0.1064 0.1146 0.1038 0.1090 0.1005 0.0935 0.0335 0.0885 0.0854 0.2125 0.1554 0.0953 0.0910 0.0884 0.0749        
[17]  0.1929 0.1800 0.1886 0.2036 0.1942 0.1962 0.1646 0.1590 0.1382 0.2518 0.1973 0.1372 0.0957 0.1375 0.1789 0.1079        
[18]  0.2956 0.2948 0.2756 0.2215 0.2235 0.2169 0.3017 0.2483 0.2775 0.3407 0.3742 0.3012 0.1439 0.2938 0.2905 0.1249 0.3114        

Table. Estimates of Evolutionary Divergence between Sequences
The number of base substitutions per site from between sequences are shown. Analyses were conducted using the Jukes-Cantor model [1]. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). This analysis involved 18 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 2852 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [2].

1. Jukes T.H. and Cantor C.R. (1969). Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN, editor, Mammalian Protein Metabolism, pp. 21-132, Academic Press, New York.
2. Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., and Tamura K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:1547-1549.
Disclaimer: Although utmost care has been taken to ensure the correctness of the caption, the caption text is provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind. Authors advise the user to carefully check the caption prior to its use for any purpose and report any errors or problems to the authors immediately (www.megasoftware.net). In no event shall the authors and their employers be liable for any damages, including but not limited to special, consequential, or other damages. Authors specifically disclaim all other warranties expressed or implied, including but not limited to the determination of suitability of this caption text for a specific purpose, use, or application.