Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families

  • Yang Liu Key Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China (Ministry of Education) and College of Life Science, Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
  • Christopher Dietrich Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, 607 Peabody Dr., Champaign, IL
  • Susan Braxton University Library, University of Illinois, 1101 S. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL
  • Yang Wang College of Biology Pharmacy and Food Engineering, Shangluo University, Shangluo, Shaanxi Province
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.504
Keywords: biodiversity, Cicadellidae, Miridae, Pyralidae, Staphylinidae

Abstract

Insect taxonomy is fundamental to global biodiversity research, but few studies have been conducted to track progress in this field using objective criteria. This study reports publishing trends in the taxonomy of four diverse, globally-distributed insect families from 1946 to 2012 to elucidate recent progress and the current status of insect taxonomy. Publications included in the Zoological Record online literature database were analyzed for Cicadellidae (leafhoppers), Miridae (plant bugs), Pyralidae (moths) and Staphylinidae (rove beetles). Data on numbers of new species, article length, species description length, authorship and collaborations, and taxonomic journals were extracted and compiled for each year. The results showed that (1) the number of taxonomic papers increased before 1980, followed by a steep decline with subsequent partial recovery; (2) the number of papers describing new species generally mirrored the trend in numbers of new species, suggesting no overall change in the proportion of larger, synthetic works (monographs) and more such work is encouraged; (3) the average number of new species described per publication decreased over the time period investigated, but with an increase in the average description pages per new species; (4) researchers from Europe and North America continue to produce the most taxonomic research on three of the four families, but the main center for Cicadellidae taxonomy has recently shifted to Asia; (5) collaboration among authors within and across continents has increased as indicated by increases in coauthored papers; and (6) journal prevalence differed for the four families and the top 10 most utilized journals for each family were given out for reference. Based on the analysis of the publication trend of the four families, we found that the overall trend toward increasing rates of species discovery is encouraging. But more human resources training and financial support on taxonomic work are required in order to complete a global faunistic inventory in a reasonable timeframe. Future study that conducts more in-depth and comprehensive analysis based on more families is required to reflect the overall trend of the insect taxonomy.

References

Adams E.N. III. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Systematic Biology 21:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/21.4.390

Agnarsson I. & Kuntner M. 2007. Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematic Biology 56: 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701424546

Audisio P. 2017. Insect taxonomy, biodiversity research and the new taxonomic impediments. Fragmenta Entomologica 49: 121–124.

Bacher S. 2012. Still not enough taxonomists: reply to Joppa et al. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.003

Backus E.A., Serrano M.S. & Ranger C.M. 2005. Mechanisms of hopperburn: an overview of insect taxonomy, behavior, and physiology. Annual Review of Entomology 50: 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123310

Benoît D. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x

Cao C., Li N., Li X. & Liu L. 2013. Reforming China’s S&T system. Science 341: 460–462. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234206

Cao Y., Dmitriev D.A. & Zhang Y. 2018. New species of the leafhopper genera Kusala Dworakowska and Diomma Motschulsky (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Erythroneurini) with description of a new subgenus. Zootaxa 4514 (2): 263–272. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4514.2.9

Cassis G. & Schuh R.T. 2012. Systematics, biodiversity, biogeography, and host associations of the Miridae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha). Annual Review of Entomology 57: 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-121510-133533

Cassis G., Wall M.A. & Schuh R.T. 2007. Insect biodiversity and industrialising the taxonomic process: the plant bug case study (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). Systematics Association Special Volume 72: 193–212.

Chapman A.D. 2009. Numbers of living Species in Australia and the World. 2nd Edition, Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra.

Dietrich C.H. 2013. Overview of the phylogeny, taxonomy and diversity of the leafhopper (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadomorpha: Membracoidea: Cicadellidae) vectors of plant pathogens. Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Insect Vectors and Insect-Borne Diseases: 47–70. Special Publication of Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute 173, Taichung, Taiwan.

Dietrich C.H. & Dmitriev D.A. 2016. Insect phylogenetics in the digital age. Current Opinion in Insect Science 18: 48–52.

Dmitriev D.A. & Dietrich C.H. 2010. Review of the species of New World Erythroneurini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae). IV. Genus Eratoneura. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 39: 80–258.

Erwin T.L. 1982. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopterists Bulletin 36: 74–75.

Erwin T.L. 1997. Biodiversity at its utmost: tropical forest beetles. In: Reaka-Kudla M., Wilson D. & Wilson E. (eds) Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting our biological Resources: 27–40. National Academies Press, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/4901

Feng L., Dietrich C.H. & Zhang Y. 2018. Two new species of Sochinsogonia (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae) from Philippines. Zootaxa 4486 (3): 340–348. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4486.3.6

Frank J.H. & Ahn K.-J. 2011. Coastal Staphylinidae (Coleoptera): a worldwide checklist, biogeography and natural history. ZooKeys 107: 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.107.1651

Gaston K.J. & May R.M. 1992. Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature 356: 281. https://doi.org/10.1038/356281a0

Gaston K.J. & O’Neill M.A. 2004. Automated species identification: why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 359: 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1442

Godfray H.C.J. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417: 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/417017a

Grieneisen M.L., Zhan Y., Potter D. & Zhang M. 2014. Biodiversity, taxonomic infrastructure, international collaboration, and new species discovery. Bioscience 64: 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu035

Hamilton K.G.A. 1983. Revision of the Macripsini and Neopsini of the New-World (Rhynchota: Homoptera: Cicadellidae) with notes on intersex morphology. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 123: 1–223.

Hebert P.D.N. & Gregory T.R. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500354886

Hopkins G.W. & Freckleton R.P. 2002. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation 5: 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943002002299

Joppa L.N., Roberts D.L. & Pimm S.L. 2011. The population ecology and social behaviour of taxonomists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 551–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.010

Joppa L.N., Roberts D.L. & Pimm S.L. 2012. Taxonomy that matters: response to Bacher. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.015

Katiyar R. 1964. Bibliography on the genus Chilo Zincken (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Contributions to Entomology 14: 125–154. https://doi.org/10.21248/contrib.entomol.14.1-2.125-154

Khan Z.R., Barrion A.T., Litsinger J.A., Castilla N.P. & Joshi R.C. 2011. A bibliography of rice leaffolders (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Science and Its Application 9: 129–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400005919

Liu Y., Xue H. & Yang X. 2015. Advances in Systematics of Chinese Mordellidae (Coleoptera): 865–870. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. [In Chinese with English abstract.]

Liu Y., Erwin T.L., Yang X. & Zhao Y. 2018. Mordellidae (Coleoptera) research: a review based on the Zoological Record between 1864 and 2013. Insects 9 (3): 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9030113

Nielson M.W. 1975. A revision of the subfamily Coelidiinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Tribes Tinobregmini, Sandersellini and Tharrini. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology 24: 1–197.

Nielson M.W. 1977. A Revision of the Subfamily Coelidiinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). II. Tribe Thagriini. Pacific Insects Monograph 34, Bishop Museum, Honolulu.

Nielson M.W. 1979. A Revision of the Subfamily Coelidiinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). III. Tribe Teruliini. Pacific Insects Monograph 35, Bishop Museum, Honolulu.

Nielson MW. 1982. A Revision of the Subfamily Coelidiinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). III. Tribe Coelidiini. Pacific Insects Monograph 38, Bishop Museum, Honolulu.

Novotny V., Basset Y., Miller S.E., Weiblen G.D., Bremer B., Cizek L. & Drozd P. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841. https://doi.org/10.1038/416841a

Oberprieler R.G., Marvaldi A.E. & Anderson R.S. 2007. Weevils, weevils, weevils everywhere. Zootaxa 520: 491–520.

Paknia O., Rajaei S.H. & Koch A. 2015. Lack of well-maintained natural history collections and taxonomists in megadiverse developing countries hampers global biodiversity exploration. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 15: 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0202-1

Pearson D.L., Hamilton A.L. & Erwin T.L. 2011. Recovery plan for the endangered taxonomy profession. Bioscience 61: 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.11

Pimm S.L., Jenkins C.N., Abell R., Brooks T.M., Gittleman J.L., Joppa L.N., Raven P.H., Roberts C.M. & Sexton J.O. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752

Rodman J.E. & Cody J.H. 2003. The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF’s partnerships for enhancing expertise in taxonomy (PEET) as a Model. Systematic Biology 52: 428–435.

Rodrigues A.S.L., Gray C.L., Crowter B.J., Ewers R.M., Stuart S.N., Whitten T. & Manica A. 2010. A global assessment of amphibian taxonomic effort and expertise. Bioscience 60: 798–806. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.6

Scheffers B.R., Joppa L.N., Pimm S.L. & Laurance W.F. 2012. What we know and don’t know about Earth’s missing biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008

Shao J. & Shen H. 2011. The outflow of academic papers from China: why is it happening and can it be stemmed? Learned Publishing 24: 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1087/20110203

Shao J. & Shen H. 2012. Research assessment and monetary rewards: the overemphasized impact factor in China. Research Evaluation 21: 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs011

Tancoigne E. & Dubois A. 2013. Taxonomy: no decline, but inertia. Cladistics 29: 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12019

Tancoigne E., Bole C., Sigogneau A. & Dubois A. 2011. Insights from Zootaxa on potential trends in zoological taxonomic activity. Frontiers in Zoology 8: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-5

Tancoigne E., Barbier M., Cointet J.P. & Richard G. 2014. The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 10: 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004

Treurnicht M., Colville J.F., Joppa L.N., Huyser O. & Manning J. 2017. Counting complete? Finalising the plant inventory of a global biodiversity hotspot. PeerJ 5: e2984. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2984

Van Emden F.L. 1957. The taxonomic significance of the characters of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 2: 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.02.010157.000515

Wang Y., Dietrich C.H. & Zhang Y. 2017. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of leafhopper subfamily Evacanthinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) based on morphological and molecular data. Scientific Reports 7: 45387. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45387

Xue Q., Mckamey S.H. & Zhang Y. 2017a. A new species of the endemic Chilean leafhopper genus Chileanoscopus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae). Zootaxa 4237 (3): 567–573. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4237.3.6

Xue Q., Mckamey S.H. & Zhang Y. 2017b. Philippogalla, a new genus for Philipposcopus modestus (Baker) from the Philippines, and a new species of Philipposcopus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae) from China. Zootaxa 4291 (1): 034–040. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4291.1.2

Xue Q., Mckamey S.H. & Zhang Y. 2017c. Redescription of the Philippine leafhopper genus Iposcopus Baker (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Idiocerinae). Zootaxa 4277 (1): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4277.1.9

Xue Q., Mckamey S.H. & Zhang Y. 2017d. Taxonomic revision of the Malaysian Idiocerinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), with description of new taxa. Zootaxa 4226 (3): 405–428 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4226.3.5

Young D.A. 1977. Taxonomic study of the Cicadellinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Part 2. New World Cicadellini and the genus Cicadella. North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 239: 1–1135.

Young D.A. 1986. Taxonomic study of the Cicadellinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Part 3. Old World Cicadellini. North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 281: 1–639.

Zahniser J.N. & Dietrich C.H. 2013. A review of the tribes of Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 45: 1–211. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2013.45

Published
2019-03-07
How to Cite
Liu, Y., Dietrich, C., Braxton, S., & Wang, Y. (2019). Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families. European Journal of Taxonomy, (504). https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.504
Issue
No. 504 (2019): Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families
Section
Entomology

Copyright (c) 2019 Yang Liu, Christopher Dietrich, Susan Braxton, Yang Wang

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Copyright Notices

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are NOT ALLOWED TO post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to taxonomic issues.