The British species of Enicospilus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Ophioninae)
Abstract
References
Aubert J.-F. 1962. Les Ichneumonides du rivage Méditerranéen français (4e série, Alpes-maritimes). Revue Française d’Entomologie 29 (1): 124–153.
Aubert J.F. 1964. Révision des travaux concernant les Ichneumonides de France et 4e supplément au catalogue de Gaulle (85 espèces nouvelles pour la faune française). Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 33 (2): 57–65, 81–84.
Aubert J.-F. 1966. Description de dix espèces nouvelles s’ajoutant aux Ichneumonides de France et du Bassin méditerranéen. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de Mulhouse 1966 (mai-juin): 37–46.
Brullé M.A. 1846. Tome Quatrième. Des Hyménoptères. Les Ichneumonides. In: Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau A. (ed.) Histoire Naturelles des Insectes: 56–521. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris.
Fitton M.G. 1984. Gravenhorst Ichneumonidae (Hym.) in Oxford. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 120: 1–6.
Fitton M.G., Graham M.W.R. de V., Bouček Z.R.J., Fergusson N.D.M., Huddleston T., Quinlan J. & Richards O.W. 1978. Kloet and Hincks. A Check List of British Insects. Hymenoptera. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 11 (4), Royal Entomological Society of London, London.
Gauld I.D. 1973. Notes on the British Ophionini (Hym., Ichneumonidae) including a provisional key to species. Entomologist’s Gazette 24: 55–65.
Gauld I.D. 1974. Further notes on the British Ophionini (Hym., Ichneumonidae). Entomologist’s Gazette 25: 147–148.
Gauld I.D. 1988. A survey of the Ophioninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) of tropical Mesoamerica with special reference to the fauna of Costa Rica. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology 57: 1–309.
Gauld I.D. 1991. The Ichneumonidae of Costa Rica 1. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 47, American Entomological Institute, Gainesville, FL.
Gauld I.D. & Mitchell P.A. 1978. The Taxonomy, Distribution and Host Preferences of African Parasitic Wasps of the Subfamily Ophioninae. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, Slough, London.
Gauld I.D. & Mitchell P.A. 1981. The Taxonomy, Distribution and Host Preferences of Indo-Papuan Parasitic Wasps of the Subfamily Ophioninae. CAB, Slough
Gravenhorst J.L.C. 1829. Ichneumonologia Europaea. Pars II. Vratislaviae.
Haller G. 1885. Entomologische Notizen. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 7: 194–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.4553
Harrington R. & Woiwod I.P. 2007. Foresight from hindsight: the Rothamsted insect survey. Outlooks on Pest Management 18 (1): 9–14.
Hill L., Randle Z., Fox R. & Parsons M. 2010. Provisional Atlas of the UK’s Larger Moths. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, Dorset.
Holmgren A.E. 1860. Försök till uppställning och beskrifning af de i Sverige funna Ophionider. (Monographia Ophionidum Sueciae). Kongliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 2: 1–158.
Horstmann K. 1997. Revision von Schlupfwespen-Arten (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Eulophidae, Torymidae). Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 87: 109–119.
Izquierdo I. 1984. Los Ophioninae españoles (Hym., Ichn.). Eos 59: 45–65.
Kokujev N.R. 1907. Revue des espèces Russes du genre Henicospilus. Trudy Russkago Entomologicheskago Obshchestva 38: 161–174.
Linnaeus C. von 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Laurnetii Salvii, Holmiae.
Morton A. DMAP. Available from www.dmap.co.uk [accessed 27 Jan. 2016]
Poda N. 1761. Insecta musei Graecensis. J.B. Dietrich, Graecii.
Ratzeburg, J.T.C. 1844. Die Ichneumonen der Forstinsecten in forstlicher und entomologischer Beziehung. Nicolaischen Buchhandlung, Berlin.
Schwarz M. & Shaw M.R. 1998. Western Palaearctic Cryptinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in the National Museums of Scotland, with nomenclatural changes, taxonomic notes, rearing records and special reference to the British check list. Part 1. Tribe Cryptini. Entomologist’s Gazette 49: 101–127.
Shestakov A. 1926. Tabula diagnostica et species novae palaearcticae generis Enicospilus Stephen. Konowia 5: 25–32.
Sperring A.H. 1952. Enicospilus tournieri Fonsc. (repentinus Hlgr.) bred from larva of Agrotis ripae Hb. Transactions and Proceedings of the South London Entomological and Natural History Society 1951 (2): 19.
Townes H.K., Momoi S. & Townes M. 1965. A Catalogue and Reclassification of the Eastern Palearctic Ichneumonidae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 5, American Entomological Institute, Gainesville, FL.
Viktorov G. A. 1957. Species of the genus Enicospilus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Stephens in USSR. Entomologicheskoye Obozreniye 36: 179–210. [In Russian]
Vollenhoven S.C.S. van 1879. Pinacographia. Illustrations of more than 1000 species of North-West- European Ichneumonidae sensu Linnaeano. Martinus Nijhoff, 'sGravenhage. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9351
Woiwod I.P. & Harrington R. 1994. Flying in the face of change: The Rothamsted Insect Survey. In: Leigh R.A. & Johnston A.E. (eds) Long-term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences: 321–342. CAB International, Wallingford.
Yu D.S., Achterberg C. van & Horstmann K. 2012. Taxapad 2012, Ichneumonoidea 2011. Database on flash-drive. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Available from www.taxapad.com [accessed 27 Jan. 2016]
Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are NOT ALLOWED TO post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to taxonomic issues.