Disporella guada sp. nov., an erect-ramose rectangulate cyclostome (Bryozoa, Stenolaemata) from the Caribbean Sea: convergent evolution in bryozoan colony morphology

  • Paul D. Taylor Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-080X
  • Jean-Georges Harmelin Aix-Marseille University, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO) & GIS Posidonie, OSU Pytheas, Station Marine d’Endoume, F-13007 Marseille, France
  • Andrea Waeschenbach Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-9345
  • Claude Bouchon EcoRécif Environnement, 17 résidence Créole, 97122 Baie-Mahault, Guadeloupe
Keywords: Lichenoporidae, growth-form, taxonomy, molecular phylogeny, evolution

Abstract

The taxonomy of cyclostome bryozoans is founded on characters of the skeleton, but molecular sequence data have increasingly shown that established higher taxa are not monophyletic. Here we describe the skeletal morphology of a new species from Guadeloupe (French West Indies) with erect ramose colonies consisting of long, curved zooids that are typical of the suborder Cerioporina among living cyclostomes. However, molecular evidence from nuclear ribosomal RNA genes 18S and 28S places the new taxon in the suborder Rectangulata, where this colony-form has not been previously recorded. It nests firmly within the genus Disporella Gray, 1848, in a strongly supported clade that also includes Plagioecia patina (Lamarck, 1816) (Tubuliporina) and the sister taxa Doliocoitis cyanea Gordon & Taylor, 2001 (Rectangulata) and Favosipora rosea Gordon & Taylor, 2001 (Cerioporina). The short and robust branches of the new Guadeloupe cyclostome, here named Disporella guada Harmelin, Taylor & Waeschenbach sp. nov., are well adapted to life in shallow rocky sites exposed to severe wave action, which appear to be its exclusive habitat.

References

Alvarez J.A. 1992. Sobre algunas especies de la familia Lichenoporidae Smitt, 1866 (Bryozoa, Cyclostomida) en la región Atlántico-Mediterránea. Parte I: género Disporella Gray, 1848. Cahiers de Biologie marine 33: 201–243.

Boardman R.S. 1983. General features of the class Stenolaemata. In: Robison R.A. (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part G (revised): 49–137. Geological Society of America, Boulder.

Boardman R.S. & McKinney F.K. 1985. Soft part characters in stenolaemate taxonomy. In: Nielsen C. & Larwood G.P. (eds) Bryozoans: Ordovician to Recent: 35–44. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.

Borg F. 1926. Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa. Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala 10: 181–507.

Borg F. 1933. A revision of the recent Heteroporidae. Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala 14: 253–394.

Brood K. 1972. Cyclostomatous Bryozoa from the Upper Cretaceous and Danian in Scandinavia. Stockholm Contributions in Geology 26: 1–464.

Buge E. & Tillier S. 1977. Doliocoitis atlantica n. gen. n. sp., cériopore (Bryozoa, Cyclostomata) des côtes d’Afrique occidentale. Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Zoologie 295: 1–23.

Busk G. 1879. On Recent species of Heteropora. The Journal of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology 14: 724–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1879.tb02357.x

Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334

Ernst A. 2021. Cyclostomata (Stenolaemata). In: Schwaha T. (ed.) Handbook of Zoology. Phylum Bryozoa: 225–263. De Gruyter, Berlin.

Fleming J. 1828. A History of British Animals. Bell & Bradfute, Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12859

Gordon D.P. & Taylor P.D. 2001. New Zealand Recent Densiporidae and Lichenoporidae (Bryozoa: Cyclostomata). Species Diversity 6: 243–290. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.6.243

Gray J.E. 1848. List of the Specimens of British Animals in the Collections of the British Museum. Part 1. Centrionae or Radiated Animals. Trustees of the British Museum, London. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1582

Harmelin J.G. 1975. Relations entre la forme zoariale et l’habitat chez les Bryozoaires Cyclostomes. Conséquences taxonomiques. In: Pouyet S. (ed.) Bryozoa 1974. Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de Lyon H.S. 3 (2): 369–384.

Harmelin J.G. 1976. Le sous-ordre des Tubuliporina (Bryozoaires Cyclostomes) en Méditerranée. Ecologie et systématique. Mémoires de l’Institut océanographique, Monaco 10: 1–326.

Hayward P.J. & Ryland J.S. 1985. Cyclostome bryozoans. Keys and notes for the identification of the species. Synopses of the British Fauna. New Series 34: 1–147.

Hincks T. 1880. A History of the British Marine Polyzoa. J. Van Voorst, London. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.3978

Jenkins H.L. & Taylor P.D. 2017. Ancestrular morphology in cyclostome bryozoans and the quest for phylogenetically informative skeletal characters. Journal of Natural History 51: 2849–2861. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1388860

Katoh K. & Standley D.M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010

Lagaaij R. 1952. The Pliocene Bryozoa of the Low Countries and their bearing on the marine stratigraphy of the North Sea region. Mededelingen van de Geologische Stichting, Serie C 5: 1–233.

Maddison W.P. & Maddison D.R. 2018. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.51.Available from http://www.mesquiteproject.org [accessed 13 Sep. 2021].

McKinney F.K. & Jackson J.B.C. 1989. Bryozoan Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.

Moyano G.H.I. 1973. Heteropora chilensis n. sp. Nuevo heteropórido para el Pacífico sudoriental (Bryozoa Cyclostomata). Cahiers de Biologie marine 14: 79–87.

Natural History Museum. 2021. Dataset: Disporella guada sp. nov., an erect rectangulate cyclostome (Bryozoa, Stenolaemata) from the Caribbean Sea: convergent evolution in bryozoan colony morphology. Natural History Museum Data Portal. https://doi.org/10.5519/agx96hyn

Nicholson H.A. 1880. On the minute structure of the recent Heteropora neozelanica, Busk, and on the relations of the genus Heteropora to Monticulipora. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5 6: 329–339, 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938009458950https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938009458971

Nye O.B. Jr. 1976. Generic revision and skeletal morphology of some cerioporid cyclostomes (Bryozoa). Bulletins of American Paleontology 69: 1–222.

Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Available from https://github.com/nylander/MrModeltest2 [accessed 13 Sep. 2021].

Osburn R.C. 1953. Bryozoa of the Pacific Coast of America. Part 3, Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, Entoprocta, and addenda. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 14: 613–841. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.6542

Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

Ross J.R.P. 1973. Calcification in the colonial stenolaemate, Heteropora. In: Larwood, G.P. (ed.) Living and Fossil Bryozoa: 475–483. Academic Press, London.

Schwaha T., Handschuh S., Ostrovsky A.N. & Wanninger A. 2018. Morphology of the bryozoan Cinctipora elegans (Cyclostomata, Cinctiporidae) with first data on its sexual reproduction and the cyclostome neuro-muscular system. BMC Ecology and Evolution 18: 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1206-1

Stebbing A.R.D. 1973. Observations on colony overgrowth and spatial competition. In: Larwood G.P. (ed.) Living and Fossil Bryozoa: 173–183. Academic Press, London.

Sukumaran J. & Holder M.T. 2010a. DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26: 1569–1571. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq228

Sukumaran J. & Holder M.T. 2010b. SumTrees: Phylogenetic Tree Summation. 4.0.0. Available at https://github.com/jeetsukumaran/DendroPy [accessed 13 Sep. 2021].

Swofford D.L. 2002. PAUP* version 4.0 b10. Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (* and other Methods). Sinauer, Sunderland.

Talavera G. & Castresana J. 2007. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56: 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164

Taylor P.D. 2000. Cyclostome systematics: phylogeny, suborders and the problem of skeletal organization. In: Herrera Cubilla A. & Jackson J.B.C. (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Bryozoology Association Conference: 87–103. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama.

Taylor P.D. 2020. Bryozoan Paleobiology. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.

Taylor P.D. & Grischenko A.V. 2015. Two new species of heavily calcified bryozoans from the intertidal of Akkeshi Bay, Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Natural History 49: 1763–1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1006287

Taylor P.D. & Waeschenbach A. 2019. Phylogenetic affinities of Crisulipora and the dual origin of branch articulation in cyclostome bryozoans. Australasian Palaeontological Memoirs 52: 155–161.

Taylor P.D. & Weedon M.J. 2000. Skeletal ultrastructure and phylogeny of cyclostome bryozoans. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 337–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb01521.x

Taylor P.D., Schembri P.J. & Cook P.L. 1989. Symbiotic associations between hermit crabs and bryozoans from the Otago region, southeastern New Zealand. Journal of Natural History 23: 1059–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938900770971

Taylor P.D., Weedon M.J. & Jones C.G. 1995. Skeletal ultrastructure in some cyclostome bryozoans of the family Lichenoporidae. Acta Zoologica 76: 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1995.tb00994.x

Taylor P.D., Waeschenbach A. & Florence W. 2011. Phylogenetic position and systematics of the bryozoan Tennysonia: further evidence for convergence and plasticity in skeletal morphology among cyclostome bryozoans. Zootaxa 3010: 58–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3010.1.5

Taylor P.D., Waeschenbach A., Smith A.M. & Gordon D.P. 2015. In search of phylogenetic congruence between molecular and morphological data in bryozoans with extreme adult skeletal heteromorphy. Systematics and Biodiversity 13: 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2015.1049673

Voigt E. 1975. Ist Domopora stellata (Goldfuss, 1862) (Bryoz. Cyclos.) = Coronopora truncata (Fleming, 1828) ein lebendes Fossil aus der Oberkreide? Zoologischer Anzeiger 195: 186–200.

Waeschenbach A., Cox C.C., Littlewood D.T.J., Porter J.S. & Taylor P.D. 2009. First molecular estimate of cyclostome bryozoan phylogeny confirms extensive homoplasy among skeletal characters used in traditional taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52: 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.002

Waters A.W. 1880. Note on the genus Heteropora. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5 6: 156–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938009458909

Weedon M.J. & Taylor P.D. 1996. Skeletal ultrastructures in some cerioporine cyclostome bryozoans. Acta Zoologica 77: 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01269.x

Published
2021-09-27
How to Cite
Taylor, P. D., Harmelin, J.-G., Waeschenbach, A., & Bouchon, C. (2021). Disporella guada sp. nov., an erect-ramose rectangulate cyclostome (Bryozoa, Stenolaemata) from the Caribbean Sea: convergent evolution in bryozoan colony morphology. European Journal of Taxonomy, 773(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.773.1507
Section
Research article