Campodeidae (Hexapoda: Diplura) from Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia, with the description of a remarkable new genus and species
Abstract
Samples collected in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, have revealed a hitherto unknown diversity of Campodeidae (Diplura) in soil and cave habitats, including a new genus and species, Kyrgyzstancampa sanare Sendra & Ferreira gen. et sp. nov., Turkmenocampa edaphica Sendra & Sánchez-García sp. nov. and a previously recognized soil-dwelling species, Campodea (Dicampa) catalana Denis, 1930. Kyrgyzstancampa sanare Sendra & Ferreira gen. et sp. nov. was collected in the deep zone of an interesting geological and cultural cave, Ak-Turpak Cave, located near the western margin of Kadamjay District, Batken Province. This genus belongs to the subfamily Campodeinae, sharing the morphology of the pretarsus with Eutrichocampa and other related genera, but differing from them in the shape of the claws and the laminar lateral processes, in addition to its unique cupuliform organ and the macrosetal pattern on the thorax and abdomen. Turkmenocampa edaphica Sendra & Sánchez-García sp. nov. was found in humid edaphic habitats, under stones or near roots, and is morphologically and geographically very similar to the cave-dwelling species Turkmenicampa mirabilis Sendra #38; Stoev, 2017, which occurs in an isolated cave in the nearby country of Turkmenistan.
References
Azadbakhsh S. & Nozari J. 2016. First faunistic study of Diplura in north of Iran with records of two species of Campodea (Campodeidae). Entomologica Fennica 27: 53–56. https://doi.org/10.33338/ef.59123
Beloglazova V.N. & Smirnova N.B. (eds) 1987. Atlas of the Kirghiz USSR. Vol. 1. Natural Conditions and Resources. USSR State Board for Geodesy & Cartography, Moscow. [In Russian]
Börner C. 1904. Zur Systematik der Hexapoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 27: 511−533.
Condé B. 1947. Eutrichocampa remyi n. sp. (Diploures Campodéidés). Bulletin de la Société des Sciences de Nancy (nouvelle série) 6 (1): 60−62.
Condé B. 1952. Contribution à la faune endogée du Sahara. Diplopodes Pénicillates, Protoures, Diploures Campodéidés. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France 76 (5–6): 349–365.
Condé B. 1955. Mission Henri Coiffait au Liban (1951). 4. Protoures et Diploures Campodéidés. Biospeologica 75: 397–412.
Condé B. 1956. Matériaux pour une monographie des Diploures Campodéidés. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle Série A. Zoologie 12: 1−202.
Condé B. 1994. Nouveaux Campodéidés endogés de Thaïlande. Revue suisse de la Zoologie 101 (2): 335−359. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.82493
Denis J.R. 1930. Sur la faune française des Aptérygotes, XIe note: Diploures avec tableau de détermination des espèces françaises. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France 55: 19–41.
Dudashvili S.D. & Mikhailyov V.N. 1990. In the Labyrinths of the Heavenly Mountains. ‘Kyrghyzstan’. Frunze. [In Russian]
García-Gómez A. 2016. Descripción de una nueva especie de Eutrichocampa (Idiocampa) (Diplura: Campodeidae) de Durango y Zacatecas, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87: 376−379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.05.003
Gvozdetskij N.A. 1981. Karst. ‘Mysl’, Moscow. [In Russian]
Ionescu M.A. 1955. Diplura. In: Academiei (ed.) Fauna Republicii Populare Române, Insecta 7 (2): 48.
Loksa I. 1960. Faunistisch-Systematische und Ökologische Untersuchungen in der Lóczy-Höhle bei Balatonfüred (Biospeologica Hungarica XL). Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis, Sectio Biologica 3: 253−266.
Lubbock J. 1873. Monograph of the Collembola and Thysanura. Ray Society, London. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11583
Mamatkulov M.M. 1978. Some morphometric indicators of the caves of Central Asia. In: Peshchery (Caves) 17: 34–37. Geographical Society of the U.S.S.R., Perm. [In Russian]
Meinert F. 1865. Campodea: en familie af Thysanurernes orden. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift 3: 400–440.
Paclt J. 1957. Diplura. In: Wytsman P. (ed.) Genera Insectorum. Fascicle 212. Mercurius, Antwerpen.
Sendra A., Sket B. & Stoev P. 2017. A striking new genus and species of troglobitic Campodeidae (Diplura) from Central Asia. Subterranean Biology 23: 47–68. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.23.14631
Sendra A., Palero F., Jiménez-Valverde A. & Reboleira A.S.P.S. 2020. Diplura in caves: diversity, ecology, evolution and biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 192 (3): 675–689.https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa116
Sendra A., Jiménez-Valverde A., Selfa J. & Reboleira A.S.P.S. 2021. Diversity, ecology, distribution and biogeography of Diplura. Insect Conservation and Diversity 14 (4): 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12480
Silvestri F. 1902. Materiali per lo studio dei Tisanuri. Bollettino della Società entomologica italiana 33: 204−249.
Silvestri F. 1931a. Campodeidae (Insecta Thysanura) dell’estremo Oriente. Bolletino del Laboratorio d’Entomologia agraria in Portici 25: 286−320.
Silvestri F. 1931b. Campodeidae (Insecta, Thysanura) di Cuba. Bolletino del Laboratorio di Zoologia generale e agraria della R. Scuola superiore d’Agricoltura in Portici 24: 299–318.
Silvestri F. 1932a. Campodeidae (Thysanura) de España (primera parte). Eos 8: 115−164.
Silvestri F. 1932b. Campodeidae (Insecta, Thysanura) dell’Unione dell’Africa Meridionale. Bolletino del Laboratorio di Zoologia generale e agraria in Portici 26: 54−86.
Silvestri F. 1933a. Nuovi contributi alla conoscenza della fauna delle isole italiane dell’Egeo. Bolletino del Laboratorio di Zoologia generale e agraria in Portici 27: 61−111.
Silvestri F. 1933b. Quarto contributo alla conoscenza dei Campodeidae (Thysanura) del Nord America. Bolletino del Laboratorio di Zoologia generale e agraria della R. Scuola superiore d’Agricoltura in Portici 27: 156–204.
Sultanov Z.S. 1972. Underground karst forms in Southern Fergana and their origin. In: Peshchery (Caves) 12–13: 88–95. Geographical Society of the U.S.S.R., Perm. [In Russian]
Turbanov I.S., Palatov D.M. & Golovatch S.I. 2016a. The state of the art of biospeleology in Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union: a review of the cave (endogean) invertebrate fauna. 1. Introduction – Crustacea. Entomological Review 96 (7): 926–963. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816070162
Turbanov I.S., Palatov D.M. & Golovatch S.I. 2016b. The state of the art of biospeleology in Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union: a review of the cave (endogean) invertebrate fauna. 2. Arachnida – acknowledgments. Entomological Review 96 (9): 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873816090116
Westwood J.O. 1842. Description of a new genus of apterous hexapod insects found near London. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 10: 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1842.tb03276.x
Wygodzinsky P. 1941. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Dipluren und Thysanuren der Schweiz. Mémoires de la Société hélvetiques des Sciences naturelles 74 mémorie 2: 113−223.
Wygodzinsky P. 1943. Una nueva especie de Eutrichocampa Silvestri, 1901 (Campodeida, Diplura). Notas del Museo de La Plata 8 (Zoologia nº 66): 141−145.
Xie R. & Yang Y. 1991. Description of two new genera and three new species of Campodeidae in China (Diplura). Contributions from the Shanghai Institute of Entomology 10: 95−102.
Copyright (c) 2021 Alberto Sendra, Alba Sánchez-García, Jesús Selfa, Dmitry A. Milko, Rodrigo Lopes Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are NOT ALLOWED TO post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to taxonomic issues.