Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus Zaldívar-Riverón & Belokobylskij, 2009

  • Rubén Castañeda-Osorio Colección Nacional de Insectos, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 3er circuito exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, A.P. 70–233, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-5477
  • Sergey A. Belokobylskij Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya naberezhnaya 1, St Petersburg, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-3459
  • Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón Colección Nacional de Insectos, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 3er circuito exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, A.P. 70–233, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5837-1929
Keywords: new species, parasitoid wasp, Hecabolini, Hymenoptera, Apocrita

Abstract

Four new species of the braconid wasp genus Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Doryctinae Foerster, 1863) are described for the Neotropical region in south and southwestern Brazil: H. acutus sp. nov., H. chrisaxeli sp. nov., H. gavinbroadi sp. nov., and H. transversalis sp. nov. We also report the morphological variation of females and males of H. mexicanus Zaldívar-Riverón & Belokobylskij, 2009, originally described based on a single female, and provide its first precise geographical distribution records. An updated key to the 13 described species of Hecabolus is provided.

References

Belokobylskij S.A. & Tobias V.I. 1986. Doryctinae. In: Medvedev G.S. (ed.) Opredelitel Nasekomych Evrospeiskoi Tsasti SSSR 3, Pereponchatokrylye 4: 21–72. Opr. Faune SSSR.

Belokobylskij S.A. & Tobias V.I. 1995. Subfamily Doryctinae. In: Medvedev G.S. (ed.) Keys to the Insects of the European Part of the USSR, Volume III, Hymenoptera, Part IV: 28–118. Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi.

Billberg G.J. 1820. Enumeratio Insectorum in Museo. Typis Gadelianis, Holmiae [Stockholm].

Čapek M. 1960. Verzeichnis der Parasiten, die aus schädlichen Insekten an VULH in Banska Stiavnica erzogen wurden. Teil I. Wirte der Brackwespen – Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Vedecke Prace 1: 199–212.

Čapek M., Hladil J. & Sedivy J. 1982. Verzeichnis der aus verschiedenen Insekten erzogenen parasitischen Hymenopteren. Teil VI. Entomological Problems 17: 325–371.

Cotton R.T. & Good N.E. 1937. Annotated List of the Insects and Mites Aassociated With Stored Grain and Cerael Products, and of their Arthropod Parasites and Predators. Miscellaneous Publication. No. 258, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

Curtis J. 1834. British Entomology; Being Illustrations and Descriptions of the Genera of Insects Found in Great Britain and Ireland. Vol. III. Dermaptera. Dyctyoptera. Orthoptera. Strepsiptera. Hymenoptera, part I. By John Curtis, London.

De Gaulle J. 1907. Catalogue systématique et biologique des Hyménoptères de France. Fam. VIII Braconidae. La Feuille des Jeunes Naturalistes 38: 163–167.

Donisthorpe H. 1940. Xorides indicatorius Latr.? parasitic on Leiopus nebulosus L., and a list of other species of hymenopterous parasites of Coleoptera in Great Britain. Entomologist 73: 14–20.

Elliot E.A. & Morley C. 1907. On the hymenopterous parasites of Coleoptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 55: 7–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1907.tb03063.x

Elliott E.A. & Morley C. 1911. XIX. On the Hymenopterous Payasites of Coleoptera. First Supplement. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 592: 452–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1911.tb03092.x

Fleming J. 1821. Insecta. In: MacVey N. (ed.) Supplement to the fourth, fifth and sixth editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, with preliminary dissertations on the history of sciences, Volume 5: 41–56. A. Constable and Company, Edinburgh.

Foerster, A. 1863. Synopsis der Familien und Gattungen der Braconiden. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens 19: 225–288.

Györfi J. 1941. Beiträge zur geographischen Verbreitung der Schlupfwespen in Finnland und zur Kenntnis deren Wirte. Annales Entomologici Fennici 7: 86–91.

Györfi J. 1943. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Wirte von Schlupfwespen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 30: 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1944.tb00588.x

Halperin J. 1986. Braconidae (Hymenoptera) associated with forest and ornamental trees and schrubs in Israel. Phytoparasitica 14: 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980898

Hedqvist K.J. 1998. Bark beetle enemies in Sweden 2. Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 52: 1–87.

Hellén W. 1927. Zur Kenntnis der Braconiden (Hym.). I. Subfam. Braconinae (part.), Rhogadinae und Spathiinae. Acta Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 56: 1–59

Hickin N.E. 1961. An introduction to the study of Anobium punctatum. Pest Control Conference of the Rentokil Group. Progress through Technology 1960: 1–34

Kleine R. 1909. Die europäischen Borkenkäfer und ihre Feinde aus den Ordnungen der Coleopteren und Hymenopteren. Entomologische Blätter 5: 41–50.

Kemp C. 2015. Museums: The endangered dead. Nature 518: 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/518292a

Kolubajiv S. 1962. Die Ergebnisse der Zuchten von Entomolophagen (der Parasiten und Räuber) der schädlichen Insekten (vorwiegend der Forstschädlinge von 1934 bis 1958). Rozpravy České Akademie 72: 1–73.

Leonardi G. 1926. Elenco delle specie di insetti dannosi e loro parasiti ricordati in Italia fino all’anno 1911. Parte II, Fasc. III. Annali del Regio Istituto Superiore Agrario in Portici 1: 148–295.

Latreille P.A. 1802. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Crustacés et des Insectes. Tome Troisiéme. L’Imprimerie F. Dufart, Paris.

Leach W. E. 1815. The Zoological Miscellany: Being Descriptions of New, or Interesting Animals. R.P. Nodder, London.

Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis (10th Edition). Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae.

Mantero G. 1904. Res ligusticae xxxiii. Materiali per un catalogo degli Imenotteri liguri. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria 41: 14–51.

Marsh P.M. 2002. The Doryctinae of Costa Rica (excluding the genus Heterospilus). Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 70: 1–319.

Marshall T.A. 1885. Monograph of British Braconidae. Part I. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1885: 1–280.

Marshall T.A. 1897. Braconidae. In: André E. (ed.). Spécies des Hyménoptères d’Europe et d’Algérie. Cote-d’Or, Beaune (1896) 5: 1–635.

Meineke E.K., Davies T.J., Daru B.H. & Davis C.C. 2018. Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 374: 20170386. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0386

Nees von Esenbeck, C.G. 1811. Icheumonides adsciti, in genera et familias divisi. Magazin der Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde in Berlin 5: 3–38.

Rainbow P.S. 2009. Marine biological collections in the 21st century. Zoologica Scripta 38: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2007.00313.x

Rondani C. 1871. Degli insetti parassiti e delle loro vittime. Continuazione. Bollettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 3: 121–143.

Rudow F. 1918. Braconiden und ihre Wirte. Entomologische Zeitschrift 32: 7–8.

Sharkey M.J. & Wharton R.A. 1997. Morphology and terminology. In: Wharton R.A., Marsh P.M. & Sharkey M.J. (eds) Manual of the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae (Hymenoptera): 19–37. Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, Washington, DC.

Shenefelt R.D. & Marsh P.M. 1976. Pars 13. Braconidae 9, Doryctinae. In: van der Vecht J. & Shenefelt R.D. (eds) Hymenopterorum Catalogus (nova edito): 263–1424. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.

Sormus de Castro C., Zaldívar-Riverón A., Briceño-G. R. & Penteado-Dias A.M. 2013. The genus Hecabolus Curtis 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) in South America, with description of six new species. Zootaxa 3664 (3): 377–391. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3664.3.8

Starý P. 1957. Notes on the Braconidae (Hym.) of Czechoslovakia IV (Part 1). Časopis České Společnosti Entomologické 54: 277–292.

Telenga N.A. 1941. Family Braconidae, subfamily Braconinae (continuation) and Sigalphinae. Fauna USSR. Hymenoptera 5. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1941.

Thompson W.R. 1953. A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests. Section 2. Host Parasite Catalogue. Part 2. Hosts of the Hymenoptera (Agaonidae to Braconidae). Commonworld Institute of the Biological Control, Ottawa.

Tobias V.I. 1971. Review of the Braconidae (Hymenoptera) of the USSR. Proceeding of the All-Union Entomological Society 54: 156–268. [In Russian.]

Tobias V.I. 1976. Braconidae of Caucasus (Hymenoptera). Nauka, Leningrad. [In Russian.]

Wegelius A. 1959. Hecabolus sulcatus Curt. Notulae Entomologicae 39: 1–30.

Wesmael C. 1837. Monographie des Braconides de Belgique. 4. Nouveaux Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles 10: 5–68.

Wesmael C. 1838. Monographie des Braconides de Belgique. Nouveaux memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles 11: 1–166.

Wharton R.A. 2006. The species of Sternaulopius Fischer (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Opiinae) and the braconid sternaulus. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 17: 317–347.

Zaldívar-Riverón A. & Belokobylskij S.A. 2009. The parasitic wasp genus Hecabolus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Doryctinae), with the description of a new species from Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 80: 419–429. https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2009.002.618

Published
2022-11-08
How to Cite
Castañeda-Osorio, R., Belokobylskij, S. A., & Zaldívar-Riverón, A. (2022). Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus Zaldívar-Riverón & Belokobylskij, 2009. European Journal of Taxonomy, 846(1), 126–151. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.846.1971
Section
Research article