A time relic: a new species of dwarf boa, Tropidophis Bibron, 1840 (Serpentes: Amerophidia), from the Upper Amazon Basin
Abstract
The amerophidian snake radiation is a Late Cretaceous superfamily that encompasses two families: Aniliidae, pipe snakes, and Tropidophiidae, dwarf boas. We describe a new dwarf boa snake species, from the Tropidophiidae family, from the cloud forest in northeastern Ecuador. Tropidophis cacuangoae sp. nov. can be diagnosed from its congeners based on external and osteological morphology. The new species inhabits eastern tropical piedmont and lower evergreen montane forests, in the Amazon Tropical Rainforest biome, and is likely to be an Ecuadorian endemic. We also discuss the relationships of the new species with South American tropidophiids and provide a key to the identification of mainland South American dwarf boas.
References
Batalha-Filho H., Fjeldså J., Fabre P.H. & Miyaki C.Y. 2013. Connections between the Atlantic and the Amazonian forest avifaunas represent distinct historical events. Journal of Ornithology 154 (1): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0866-7
Bentley A.G., Reyes-Puig J.P., Yánez-Muñoz M.H., Domínguez F.G. & Sánchez Sarango H.U. 2021. Guía Fotográfica - Herpetofauna del Alto Río Anzu. World Wildlife Fund, Gland, Switzerland.
Bogert C.M. 1968. The variations and affinities of the dwarf boas of the genus Ungaliophis. American Museum Novitates 2340: 1–26.
Brongersma L.D. 1951. Some notes upon the anatomy of Tropidophis and Trachyboa (Serpentes). Zoologische Mededelingen 31 (11): 107–124.
Chan K.O., Hertwig S.T., Neokleous D.N., Flury J.M. & Brown R.M. 2022. Widely used, short 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene fragments yield poor and erratic results in phylogenetic estimation and species delimitation of amphibians. BMC Ecology and Evolution 22 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01994-y
Coborn J. 1991. The Atlas of Snakes of the World. TFH Publications, Neptune City, NJ.
Cundall D. & Irish F. 2008. The snake skull. In: Gans C., Gaunt A.S. & Adler K. (eds) Biology of Reptilia. The Skull of Lepidosauria: 349–692. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Press, USA.
Curcio F.F., Sales Nunes P.M., Argolo A.J.S., Skuk G. & Rodrigues M.T. 2012. Taxonomy of the South American dwarf boas of the genus Tropidophis Bibron, 1840, with the description of two new species from the Atlantic forest (Serpentes: Tropidophiidae). Herpetological Monographs 26 (1): 80–121. https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPMONOGRAPHS-D-10-00008.1
Díaz L.M. & Cádiz A. 2020. A new species of Tropidophis (Squamata: Tropidophiidae) and molecular phylogeny of the Cuban radiation of the genus. Novitates Caribaea 16: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33800/nc.vi16.222
Drummond A.J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A. 2011. Geneious v5.4. Available from http://www.geneious.com [accessed 15 December 2022].
Entiauspe-Neto O.M., Abegg A.D., Koch C., Nuñez L.P., Azevedo W.D.S., Moraes L.J., Tiutenko A., Bialves T. & Loebmann D. 2021. A new species of Erythrolamprus (Serpentes: Dipsadidae: Xenodontini) from the savannas of northern South America. Salamandra 57 (2): 196–218.
Ferrarezzi H. 1994. Uma sinopse dos gêneros e classificação das Serpentes (Squamata): I. Scolecophidia e Alethinophidia não colubrídeos. In: Nascimento L.B., Bernardes T.A. & Cotta G.A. (eds) Herpetologia do Brasil Vol. 1: 69–80. Editora PUC-MG Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte.
Gauthier J.A., Kearney M., Maisano J.A., Rieppel O. & Behlke A.D. 2012. Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History 53 (1): 3–308. https://doi.org/10.3374/014.053.0101
Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S. & Nixon K.C. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24 (5): 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x
Head J.J. 2015. Fossil calibration dates for molecular phylogenetic analysis of snakes 1: Serpentes, Alethinophidia, Boidae, Pythonidae. Palaeontologia Electronica 18 (6FC): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26879/487
Katoh K., Rozewicki J. & Yamada K.D. 2017. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20 (4): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
Ledo R.M.D. & Colli G.R. 2017. The historical connections between the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest revisited. Journal of Biogeography 44 (11): 2551–2563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13049
Lee M.S. & Scanlon J.D. 2002. The Cretaceous marine squamate Mesoleptos and the origin of snakes. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum: Zoology Series 68 (2): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0968047002000158
Machado D.J. 2015. YBYRÁ facilitates comparison of large phylogenetic trees. BioMedCentral Bioinformatics 16 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0642-9
Miralles A., Marin J., Markus D., Herrel A., Hedges S.B. & Vidal N. 2018. Molecular evidence for the paraphyly of Scolecophidia and its evolutionary implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 31 (12): 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13373
Montingelli G.G., Barbo F.E., Pereira Filho G.A., Santana G.G., França F.G.R., Grazziotin F.G. & Zaher H. 2020. A second new species for the rare dipsadid genus Caaeteboia Zaher et al., 2009 (Serpentes: Dipsadidae) from the Atlantic Forest of northeastern Brazil. Cuadernos de Herpetología 34: 219–230.
Oelrich T.M. 1956. The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae). Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 94: 1–59.
Ortega-Andrade H.M., Rodes Blanco M., Cisneros-Heredia D.F., Guerra Arévalo N., López de Vargas-Machuca K.G., Sánchez-Nivicela J.C., et al. 2021. Red List assessment of amphibian species of Ecuador: A multidimensional approach for their conservation. PLoS One 16 (5): e0251027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251027
O’Shea M. 2018. The Book of Snakes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Peters J.A. 1963. Taxonomic notes on Ecuadorian snakes. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 3 (1): 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650526309360366
Peters J.A. & Orejas-Miranda B. 1970. Catalogue of the Neotropical Squamata: Snakes. United States National Museum Bulletin 297: 1–347.
Peters W.C.H. 1860. Eine neue Gattung von Riesenschlangen vor, welche von einem gebornen Preussen, Hrn. Carl Reiss, in Guayaquil nebst mehreren anderen werthvollen Naturalien dem zoologischen Museum zugesandt worden ist. Monatsberichte der königlichen preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1860: 200–202.
Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T. & Wiens J.J. 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13 (1): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-93
Reynolds R.G., Niemiller M.L. & Revell L.J. 2014. Toward a Tree-of-Life for the boas and pythons: Multilocus species-level phylogeny with unprecedented taxon sampling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 71: 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.11.011
Savage J.M. & Slowinski J.B. 1992. The colouration of the venomous coral snakes (family Elapidae) and their mimics (families Aniliidae and Colubridae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 45 (3): 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00642.x
Siegel D.S., Miralles A. & Aldridge R.D. 2011. Controversial snake relationships supported by reproductive anatomy. Journal of Anatomy 218 (3): 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01334.x
Simões T.R., Caldwell M.W. & Kellner A.W. 2015. A new Early Cretaceous lizard species from Brazil, and the phylogenetic position of the oldest known South American squamates. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 13 (7): 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2014.947342
Simpson N., Reyes-Puig C., Tobar C. & Yánez-Muñoz M.H. 2013. Herpetofauna en áreas prioritarias para la conservación: El sistema de Reservas Jocotoco y Ecominga. MECN-JOCOTOCO-ECOMINGA 2013.
Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30 (9): 1312–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Tamura K., Stecher G. & Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38 (7): 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
Uetz P., Freed P. & Hošek J. 2022. The Reptile Database. Available from http://www.reptile-database.org [accessed 5 Jan. 2022].
Vidal N., Delmas A.S., David P., Cruaud C., Couloux A. & Hedges S.B. 2007. The phylogeny and classification of caenophidian snakes inferred from seven nuclear protein-coding genes. Comptes Rendus Biologies 330 (2): 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2006.10.001
Wang X., Auler A.S., Edwards R.L., Cheng H., Cristalli P.S., Smart P.L. & Shen C.C. 2004. Wet periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210 kyr linked to distant climate anomalies. Nature 432 (7018): 740–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03067
Wiens J.J., Hutter C.R., Mulcahy D.G., Noonan B.P., Townsend T.M., Sites Jr. J.W. & Reeder T.W. 2012. Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biology Letters 8: 1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0703
Zaher H. 1994. Comments on the evolution of the jaw adductor musculature of snakes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 111 (4): 339–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1994.tb01488.x
Zhang J., Kapli P., Pavlidis P. & Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29 (22): 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499
Copyright (c) 2022 H. Mauricio Ortega-Andrade, Alexander Bentley, Claudia Koch, Mario H. Yánez-Muñoz, Omar M. Entiauspe-Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are NOT ALLOWED TO post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to taxonomic issues.