Additions and corrections to taxonomy of Apobaetis fiuzai Salles & Lugo-Ortiz, 2002 and Apobaetis kallawaya Nieto, 2006 (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae)

  • Cláudia R.T. De Lima Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-7075
  • Paulo Vilela Cruz Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-4628
  • Neusa Hamada Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Coordenação de Pós-Graduação (COPOG), Divisão do Curso em Entomologia (DiEnt), Coordenação de Biodiversidade (CoBio), Laboratório de Citotaxonomia e Insetos Aquáticos, CEP 69067-375, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-5426
Keywords: review, corrections, new species, intraspecific variation

Abstract

Recently, it has been hypothesized that the wide distribution of A. fiuzai Salles & Lugo-Ortiz is due to a wide diagnosis and conflicting keys. The same arguments can be applied to A. kallawaya Nieto. In order to test this hypothesis, we revised the type material of A. fiuzai, literature of A. kallawaya, and part of the recorded specimens in Brazil. As a result, three new species from previous records are recognized: Apobaetis pasternakae sp. nov., former A. fiuzai in Amazonas, Roraima and Maranhão states; Apobaetis jaquelinae sp. nov., former A. fiuzai in Rondônia State; Apobaetis luanae sp. nov., former A. kallawaya in Rondônia State. The new data showed that A. fiuzai does not occur in the Amazon Biome and A. kallawaya does not occur in Brazil. Records of A. fiuzai that could not be reviewed in this study are treated as putative and should be evaluated in the light of the new evidence. We also studied the intraspecific variation in A. fiuzai and A. pasternakae sp. nov. The pigment pattern of the nymphs was not considered a robust characteristic for the species differentiation due to the wide variation in and between populations, and interspecific similarity of many features. On the other hand, classical morphological characters such as mouthparts, legs, spines of terga, paraproct and caudal filaments have minimal variation, stable and reliable for specific identification.

References

Boldrini R. & Cruz P.V. 2014. Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from the state of Rondônia, Northern Brazil. Boletim do Museu Integrado de Roraima 8 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24979/bolmirr.v8i01

Boldrini R., Cruz P.V., Salles F.F., Belmont E.L. & Hamada N. 2012. Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from northeastern Brazil. Check List 8 (1): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.15560/8.1.088

Cruz P.V. 2020. Redescription of three species of Apobaetis Day, 1955 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Zootaxa 4808 (2): 317–330. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4808.2.5

Cruz P.V. & De-Souza M.R. 2014. Two new species of Apobaetis Day, 1955 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 3866 (4): 591–599. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3866.4.9

Cruz P.V., Boldrini R. & Salles F.F. 2011. Apobaetis Day (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from northern Brazil: description of a new species and of the male imago of A. fiuzai Salles & Lugo-Ortiz. Aquatic Insects 33 (1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2011.572557

Cruz P.V., Boldrini R. & Hamada N. 2020. Redescription of Apobaetis lakota McCafferty, 2000 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) and description of two new species from Brazil. Zootaxa 4885 (2): 249–258. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4885.2.6

Cruz P.V., Nieto C., Gattolliat J.L., Salles F.F. & Hamada N. 2021. A cladistic insight into the higher level classification of Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera). Systematic Entomology 46 (1): 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12446

Cruz P.V., Boldrini R., De Lima C.R. & Hamada N. 2022. It is a mess! How many species are in Rivudiva trichobasis Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty, 1998 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)? European Journal of Taxonomy 789: 153–191. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.789.1639

Coleman C.O. 2006. Substituting time-consuming pencil drawings in arthropod taxonomy using stacks of digital photographs. Zootaxa 1360 (1): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1360.1.4

Day W.C. 1955. New genera of mayflies from California (Ephemeroptera). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 31: 121–137. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53440907 [accessed 20 Jun. 2023].

Domínguez E., Molineri C., Pescador M., Hubbard M. & Nieto C. 2006. Ephemeroptera of South America / Ephemeroptera de América del Sur. Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America / Biodiversidad Acuática en América Latina 2. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow.

Falcão J.N., Salles F.F. & Hamada, N. 2011. Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) ocorrentes em Roraima, Brasil: Novos registros e chaves para gêneros e espécies no estágio ninfal. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55 (4): 516–548. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0085-56262011005000048

Glazaczow A. 1997. Observations on the psammophilous mayfly species Procloeon nanum in the North East of Poland. In: Landolt P. (ed.) Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera: Biology-Ecology-Systematics: 83–87. MTL, Fribourg.

Hubbard M.D. 1995. Towards a standard methodology for the description of mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Current directions in research on Ephemeroptera. In: Corkum L. & Ciborowski I. (eds) Current Directions in Research on Ephemeroptera: 361–369. Canadian Scholars’ Press, Toronto.

Huber F. & Dos Reis F.H. 2011. Técnica alternativa para montagem de insetos em lâminas permanentes para visualização em microscopia óptica. Entomobrasilis 4 (1): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v4i1.112

Jacobus L.M. 2013. South Carolina mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) of conservation concern. Journal of the South Carolina Academy of Science 11 (1): 6.

Kawada R. & Buffington M.L. 2016. A scalable and modular dome illumination system for scientific microphotography on a budget. PLoS ONE 11 (5): e0153426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153426

Kluge N.Ju. & Novikova E.A. 2011. Systematics of the mayfly taxon Acentrella (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae), with description of new Asian and African species. Russian Entomological Journal 20 (1): 1–56. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.20.1.01

Lima L.R., Salles F.F. & Pinheiro U. 2012. Ephemeroptera (Insecta) from Pernambuco State, northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 56 (3): 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0085-56262012005000043

Lugo-Ortiz C.R. & McCafferty W.P. 1997. First report and new species of the genus Apobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from South America. Aquatic Insects 19 (4): 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650429709361659

McCafferty W.P. 1991. Comparison of Old and New World Acanthametropus (Ephemeroptera: Acanthametropodidae) and other psammophilous mayflies. Entomological News 102 (5): 205–214. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16252244 [accessed 20 Jun. 2023].

McCafferty W.P. 2000. A new Nearctic Apobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Entomological News 111 (4): 265–269.

Meyer M.D. & McCafferty W.P. 2003. New synonym of Apobaetis etowah (Traver) (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 79: 249.

Nieto C. 2006. New species of the genus Apobaetis Day (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Bolivia and Argentina. Annales de Limnologie 42 (3): 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2006020

Salles F.F. & Lugo-Ortiz C.R. 2002. A distinctive new species of Apobaetis (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Mato Grosso and Minas Gerais, Brazil. Zootaxa 35 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.35.1.1

Salles F.F., Francischetti C.N., Roque F. de O., Pepinelli M. & Strixino S.T. 2003. Levantamento preliminar dos gêneros e espécies de Baetidae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) do estado de São Paulo, com ênfase em coletas realizadas em córregos florestados de baixa ordem. Biota Neotropica 3 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-06032003000200011

Salles F.F., Da-Silva E.R., Serrão J.E. & Francischetti C.N. 2004. Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) na região sudeste do Brasil: novos registros e chave para os gêneros no estágio ninfal. Neotropical Entomology 33 (6): 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-566x2004000600010

Salles F.F., do Nascimento J.M.C., Massariol F.C., Angeli K.B., Barcelos e Silva P., Rúdio J.A. & Boldrini R. 2010. Primeiro levantamento da fauna de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) do Espírito Santo, Sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotropica 10 (1): 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-06032010000100025

Traver J.R. 1935. Systematic, part II. In: Needham J.G., Traver J.R. & Hsu Y. (eds) The Biology of Mayflies with a Systematic Account of North American Species: 237–739. Comstock, Ithaca, New York.

Published
2023-07-13
How to Cite
De Lima, C. R., Cruz, P. V., & Hamada, N. (2023). Additions and corrections to taxonomy of Apobaetis fiuzai Salles & Lugo-Ortiz, 2002 and Apobaetis kallawaya Nieto, 2006 (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). European Journal of Taxonomy, 879(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.879.2167
Section
Research article