Linear listing order and hierarchical classification: history, conflict, and use

Keywords: alphabetic order of taxa, collapsing nodes, hierarchical classification vs linear listing order, history of taxonomy, linear classification

Abstract

Taxonomic criteria alone are not sufficient to determine a linear sequence for the arrangement of collection specimens according to a preferred classification or the linear sequence according to which taxa are best discussed in articles or books. The choice of methodology to obtain a linear sequence of taxa in agreement with a hierarchical classification has been little studied and remains controversial. In this article, I offer an historical background, before examining properties, use and limits of possible listing criteria. The result of a linearization effort depends on arbitrary choices with respect to two aspects of the hierarchical classification we intend to linearize. One is the order to be followed in listing the immediately subordinate members of a given taxon, the other is the choice of the sets of taxa to be linearized according to tradition, alphabetic order or other criterion. The example presented here, related to the “orders” of Hexapoda, demonstrates the need to specify very clearly the extent and composition of the uncollapsed classification backbone retained in the linearization procedure.

References

APG I (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531–553. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992015

APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x

APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x

APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385

Aristotle. 1910. Historia animalium. Translated by D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Ax P. 2000. Multicellular Animals. The Phylogenetic System of the Metazoa. Vol. II. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10396-8

Barsanti G. 1992. La scala, la mappa, l’albero. Immagini e classificazioni della natura fra Sei e Ottocento. Sansoni, Firenze.

Belon P. 1555. L’Histoire de la nature des oyseaux. Cavellat, Paris.

Berlin B. 1973. Folk systematics in relation to biological classification and nomenclature. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001355

Berlin B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862597

Berlin B., Breedlove D.E. & Raven P.H. 1966. Folk taxonomies and biological classification. Science 154 (3746): 273–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3746.273

Berlin B., Breedlove D.E. & Raven P.H. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75: 214–242. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140

Beutel R.G., Yavorskaya M.I., Mashimo Y., Fukui M. & Meusemann K. 2017. The phylogeny of Hexapoda (Arthropoda) and the evolution of megadiversity. Proceedings of the Arthropodan Embryological Society of Japan 51: 1–15.

Bliss H.E. 1929. The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. Henry Holt and Company, New York, NY.

Brisson M.J. 1756. Le Regne animal divisé en ix classes, ou méthode contenant la division générale des animaux en ix classes, & la division particulière des deux premières classes, sçavoir de celle des quadrupèdes & de celle des cetacées, en ordres, sections, genres & espèces. Bauche, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.70840

Brunfels O. 1530. Herbarum vivae eiconeb [sic] ad naturȩ imitationem, summa cum diligentia et artificio effigiatȩ, unà cum effectibus earundem, in gratiam veteris illius, & jamjam renascentis herbariae medicinae. Apud Joannem Schottum, Strasbourg [Argentorati]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.8049

Caesalpinus A. 1583. De plantis libri XVI. G. Marescottus, Florence [Florentiae]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.60929

Conix S., Garnett S.T., Thiele K.R., Christidis L., van Dijk P.P., Bánki O.S., Barik S.K., Buckeridge J.S., Costello M.J., Hobern D., Dirk P.M., Lien A.M., Nikolaeva S., Pyle R.L., Thomson S.A., Zhang Z. & Zachos F.E. 2021. Towards a universal list of accepted species III: Independence and stakeholder inclusion. Organisms, Diversity, and Evolution 21: 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00496-x

Cronquist A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

Daudin H. 1926. Cuvier et Lamarck: les classes zoologiques et l’idée de série animale (1790–1830). Alcan, Paris.

Donati V. 1750. Della storia naturale marina dell’Adriatico. Saggio. Francesco Storti, Venezia.

Fuchs L. 1542. De historia stirpium commentarii insignes. Officina Isingriniana, Basel.

Gesner C. 1551. Historiae animalium liber primus de quadrupedibus viviparis. C. Froschoverus, Zurich [Tiguri].

Giribet G. & Edgecombe G.D. 2020. The Invertebrate Tree of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, and Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691197067

Haston E., Richardson J.E., Stevens P.F., Chase M.W. & Harris D.J. 2007. A linear sequence of Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II families. Taxon 56: 7–12.

Haston E., Richardson J.E., Stevens P.F., Chase M.W. & Harris D.J. 2009. The Linear Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (LAPG) III: A linear sequence of the families in APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 128–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01000.x

Hawthorne W.D. & Hughes C.E. 2008. Optimising linear taxon sequences derived from phylogenetic trees – a reply to Haston & al. Taxon 57: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.573002

Hermann P. 1689. In: Tournefort J. Pitton de, Hermann P. & Sherard W. Schola botanica sive Catalogus plantarum, quas ab aliquot annis in horto regio Parisiensi studiosis indigitavit vir clarissimus Joseph Pitton Tournefort, D. M. ut et Pauli Hermanni P. P. Paradisi Batavi Prodromus, in quo plantae rariores omnes, in Batavorum hortis hactenus cultae, & plurimam partem a nemine antea descriptae recensentur. Edente in lucem S. W. A. Apud Henricum Wetstenium, Amsterdam [Amstelaedami].

Hjørland B. 2017. Classification. Knowledge Organization 44 (2): 97–128.

Hobern D., Barik S.K., Christidis L., Garnett S.T., Kirk P., Orrell T.M., Pape T., Pyle R.L., Thiele K.R., Zachos F.E. & Bánki O.S. 2021. Towards a universal list of accepted species VI: The catalogue of life checklist. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 21: 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00516-w

Jenner R. 2022. Ancestors in Evolutionary Biology. Linear Thinking about Branching Trees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316226667

Jussieu A.-L. de. 1774. Exposition d’un nouvel ordre de plantes adopté dans les démonstrations du Jardin royal. Histoire de l'Académie royale des Sciences, avec les Mémoires de Mathématique et de Physique 1774: 175–197. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/28019755 [accessed 10 Oct. 2023].

Jussieu A.-L. de. 1789. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Heissant et Barrois, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.284

[Jussieu A.-L. de]. 1824. Méthode naturelle des végétaux (Bot.). Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles 30: 426–468. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25300753 [accessed 10 Oct. 2023].

Klein J.Th. 1734. Naturalis dispositio echinodermatum. Accessit lucubratiuncula de aculeis echinorum marinorum, cum spicilegio de belemnitis. Schreiber, Gdańsk [Gedani]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.65731

Lamarck [J.-B. Monet] chevalier de. 1778. Flore françoise. Agasse Imprimerie royale, Paris.

de Lamarck J.-B. 1800–1806. Discours d’ouverture des Cours de Zoologie, donnés dans le Muséum d’Histoire naturelle (an VIII, an X, an XI et 1806). [1906. Reprinted in Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique 40: 443–595.]

Lamarck J.B. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres, ou tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux; présentant leurs caractères essentiels et leur distribution, d’après la considération de leurs rapports naturelles et de leur organisation, et suivant l’arrangement établi dans les galeries du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, parmi leurs dépouilles conservées; précédé du discours d’ouverture du Cours de Zoologie, donné dans la Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle l’an 8 de la République. Deterville, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.116650

Lamarck J.-B.-P.-A. 1809. Philosophie zoologique, ou exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux, I. Dentu, Paris.

Lamarck [J.-B. Monet chevalier] Delamarck. 1812. Extrait du cours de zoologie du muséum d’histoire naturelle, sur les animaux sans vertèbres. D’Hautel, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.10431

Lamarck [J.-B. Monet] chevalier de. 1815–22. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. Verdière, Paris (vols 1 (1815), 2 (1816), 3 (1816)); Deterville & Verdière, Paris (vols. 4 (1817), 5 (1818)); chez l’Auteur, Paris (vols. 6 (1819, 1822), 7 (1822)). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12712

Lien A.M., Conix S., Zachos F.E., Christidis L., van Dijk P.P., Bánki O.S., Barik S.K., Buckeridge J.S., Costello M.J., Hobern D., Montgomery N., Nikolaeva S., Pyle R.L., Thiele K., Thomson S.A., Zhang Z.-Q. & Garnett S.T. 2021. Towards a global list of accepted species IV. Overcoming fragmentation in the governance of taxonomic lists. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 21: 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00499-8

Linnæus C. 1735. Systema naturae. Th. Haak, Leiden.

Linnæus C. 1749. Museum Adolpho-Fridericianum. Amoenitates academicæ 1: 277–326. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.910

Linnaeus C. 1753. Museum Tessinianum, opera illustrissimi comitis, dom. Car. Gust. Tessin collectum. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm [Holmiae].

Linnæus C. 1754. Adolphi Friderici Regis Svecorum, Gothorum, Vandalorumquae & c. in quo animalia rariora imprimis et exotica, quadrupedia, aves, amphibia, pisces, insecta, vermes describuntur et determinatur, latine et suetice cum iconibus. Typ. Regia, Stockholm [Holmiae].

Linnæus C. 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima. Tomus 1. Laurenti Salvi, Stockholm [Holmiae]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

Linnæus C. 1764a. Museum S:æ R:æ M:tis Ludovicæ Ulricæ Reginæ in quo animalia rariora, exotica, imprimis insecta & conehilia describuntur & determinantur. Laurenti Salvi, Stockholm [Holmiae]. https://doi.org/10.5962/t.173012

Linnæus C. 1764b. Museum S:æ R:æ M:tis Adolphi Friderici regis Svecorum, Gothorum, Vandalorumque & c. & c. & c. in quo animalia rariora imprimis et exotica, aves, amphibia, pisces describuntur. Tomi secundi prodromus. Laurenti Salvi, Stockholm [Holmiae].

Macleay W.S. 1819–1821. Horæ Entomologicæ: or Essays on the Annulose Animals. R. and A. Taylor, London.

Minelli A. 2021. On the nature of organs and organ systems – A chapter in the history and philosophy of biology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: e745564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.745564

Minelli A. 2022a. The species before and after Linnaeus – tension between disciplinary nomadism and conservative nomenclature. In: Wilkins J., Zachos F. & Pavlinov I. (eds) Species Problems and Beyond: Contemporary Issues in Philosophy and Practice: 191–226. CRC Press, Boca Raton – London – New York. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367855604-13

Minelli A. 2022b. Species. In: Hjørland B. & Gnoli C. (eds) ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization (IEKO) (online 2022). Available from https://www.isko.org/cyclo/species [accessed 10 Oct. 2023].

Minelli A. In press. Botanica, storia e antiquaria nell’opera di Giulio Pontedera (1688–1757). Fatti e figure dell’Università di Padova. Accademia Galileiana, Padova.

Moffett Th. 1634. Insectorum sive minimorum animalium theatrum. Cotes, London. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.60501

Nelson G.J. 1972. Cephalic sensory canals, pitlines, and the classification of esocoid fishes, with notes on galaxiids and other teleosts. American Museum Novitates 2492:1–49.

Nelson G.J. 1974. Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. Systematic Zoology 22: 344–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412943

Nielsen C. 2012. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606023.001.0001

Novick A. 2016. On the origins of the quinarian system of classification. Journal of the History of Biology 49: 95–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9419-2

Plumier C. 1693. Description des plantes de l’Amerique. Imprimerie Royale, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.911

Pontedera J. 1718. Compendium tabularum botanicarum, in quo plantae CCLXXII ab eo in Italia nuper detectae recensentur. Typis Seminarii apud Joannem Manfrè, Padua [Patavii].

Pontedera J. 1720. Anthologia sive de floris natura libri tres; plurimis inventis observationibusque, ac aereis tabulis ornati. Accedunt ejusdem Dissertationes undecim ex iis, quas habuit in Horto publico Patavino anno 1719, quibus res botanica et subinde etiam medica illustratur. Typis Seminarii apud Joannem Manfrè, Padua [Patavii].

Pyle R.L., Barik S.J., Christidis L., Conix S., Costello M.J., van Dijk P.P., Garnett S.T., Hobern D., Kirk P.M., Lien A.M., Orrell T.M., Remsen D., Thomson S.A., Wambiji N., Zachos F.E., Zhang Z-Q. & Thiele K.R. 2021. Towards a universal list of accepted species V: the devil is in the detail. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 21: 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00504-0

Ray J. 1660. Catalogus plantarum circa Cantabrigiam nascentium. John Field, Cambridge.

Ray J. 1677. Catalogus plantarum Angliæ, et insularum adjacentium: tum indigenas, tum in agris passim cultas complectens. A. Clark, impensis J. Martyn, London [Londini]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82234

Rigato E. & Minelli A. 2013. The great chain of being is still here. Evolution: Education and Outreach 6: e18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-18

Rondelet G. 1554. Libri de piscibus marinis, in quibus veræ piscium effigies expressæ sunt. M. Bonhomme, Lyon [Lugduni]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.64229

Ruggiero M.A., Gordon D.P., Orrell T.M., Bailly N., Bourgoin T., Brusca R.C., Cavalier-Smith T., Guiry M.D. & Kirk P.M. 2015. A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS ONE 10 (4): e0119248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248

Schmitt S. 2022. Les travaux zoologiques de Jacob Theodor Klein (1685–1759) et leur réception en France: une opposition mesurée au linnéisme. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 75: 159–195. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhs.751.0159

Stevens P.F. 1984. Metaphors and typology in the development of botanical systematics 1690–1960, or the art of putting new wine in old bottles. Taxon 33: 169–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1221161

Stevens P.F. 1994. The Development of Biological Systematics: Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu, Nature, and the Natural System. Columbia University Press, New York.

Stevens P.F. 2007 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, vers. 8. Phylogeny and Evolution of Seed Plants. Available from http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/orders/Introstudent.html [accessed 10 Oct. 2023].

Thiele K.R., Conix S., Pyle R.L., Barik S.K., Christidis L., Costello M.J., van Dijk P.P., Kirk P., Lien A.M., Thomson S.A., Zachos F.E., Zhang Z. & Garnett S.T. 2021. Toward a global list of accepted species I. Why taxonomists sometimes disagree, and why this matters. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 21: 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00495-y

Thomson S.A., Thiele K., Conix S., Christidis L., Costello M.J., Hobern D., Nikolaeva S., Pyle R.L., van Dijk P.P., Weaver H., Zachos F.E., Zhang Z.-Q. & Garnett S.T. 2021. Towards a universal list of accepted species II. Consequences of inadequate taxonomic list governance. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 21: 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00518-8

Thorne R.F. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365–389. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19921302.08

Tournefort J.P. de. 1694. Elémens de botanique, ou méthode pour connoìtre les plantes. Tome 1. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.

Vicq-d’Azyr F. 1792. Encyclopédie méthodique. Système anatomique. Quadrupèdes. Tome second. Panckoucke, Paris.

Wettstein R. 1924. Handbuch der systematischen Botanik. 3rd ed. Deuticke, Leipzig and Vienna.

Willughby F. 1686. De historia piscium libri quatuor. E Theatro Sheldoniano, Oxford [Oxonii]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.140311

Published
2023-11-15
How to Cite
Minelli, A. (2023). Linear listing order and hierarchical classification: history, conflict, and use. European Journal of Taxonomy, 908(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.908.2331
Section
Opinion Paper