Caerostris (Araneidae: Araneae) cryptic diversity highlights the need for taxonomic expertise in the genomic era
Abstract
Bark spiders (Caerostris Thorell, 1868, Araneidae Clerck, 1757) are large spiders distributed across the Old-World tropics. This genus was understudied until recently, but received more attention following the discovery of unique web evolution and biomaterial properties of its species. Caerostris are characterized by web gigantism, reaching extremes in Darwin’s Bark spider (C. darwini Kuntner & Agnarsson, 2010), which employs the toughest known silk. Due to the exceptional silk of C. darwini, recent research provided whole-genome sequencing and silk-gene mapping for C. darwini and a sympatric congener misassigned, due to cryptic diversity, to C. extrusa Butler, 1882. We describe a case of convergent evolution in somatic morphology that further hinders species identification in the field. Conducting a morphological and molecular investigation of exemplars that share the “C. extrusa morphotype”, we conclude they belong to four distinct species. We redescribe the two valid ones, C. extrusa and C. hirsuta (Simon, 1895), elevate the previously synonymized C. bankana Strand, 1915 to species level, and newly describe C. kuntneri sp. nov., the species used in the assembly of its genome. We argue this to be an example of how the global taxonomic impediment can lead to errors in rapidly advancing fields such as genomics.
References
Agnarsson I. & Kuntner M. 2007. Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematic Biology 56: 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701424546
Agnarsson I., Kuntner M. & Blackledge T.A. 2010. Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider. PLoS ONE 5: e11234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011234
Babb P.L., Gregorič M., Lahens N.F., Nicholson D.N., Hayashi C.Y., Higgins L., Kuntner M., Agnarsson I. & Voight B.F. 2022. Characterization of the genome and silk-gland transcriptomes of Darwin’s bark spider (Caerostris darwini). PLoS ONE 17: e0268660. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268660
Barrett R.D.H. & Hebert P.D.N. 2005. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83 (3): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-024
Blackwall J. 1866. A list of spiders captured in the south-east region of equatorial Africa, with descriptions of such species as appear to be new to arachnologists. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 18 (108): 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222936608679683
Bond J.E., Godwin R.L., Colby J.D., Newton L.G., Zahnle X.J., Agnarsson I., Hamilton C.A. & Kuntner M. 2022. Improving taxonomic practices and enhancing its extensibility; an example from araneology. Diversity 14: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010005
Butler A.G. 1882. On some new species of the genus Caerostris from Madagascar. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 10: 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938209459680
Clerck C. 1757. Aranei Svecici. Svenska Spindlar, uti Sina Hufvud-Slågter Indelte Samt Under Några och Sextio Särskildte Arter Beskrefne och med Illuminerade Figurer Uplyste. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholmiae, Stockholm. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.119890
Čandek K., Gregorič M., Kostanjšek R., Frick H., Kropf C. & Kuntner M. 2013. Targeting a portion of central European spider diversity for permanent preservation. Biodiversity Data Journal 1: e980. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.1.e980
Darriba D., Taboada G.L., Doallo R. & Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
Drew L.W. 2011. Are we losing the science of taxonomy?: As need grows, numbers and training are failing to keep up. BioScience 61: 942–946. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.4
Fabricius J.C. 1793. Entomologiae Systematica Emendata et Aucta, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species Adjectis Synonimis, Locis, Observationibus, Descriptionibus. Tom. II. Christian Gottlieb Proft, Hafniae, Copenhagen. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.125869
Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R. & Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.
Garb J.E., Haney R.A., Schwager E.E., Gregorič M., Kuntner M., Agnarsson I. & Blackledge T.A. 2019. The transcriptome of Darwin’s bark spider silk glands predicts proteins contributing to dragline silk toughness. Communications Biology 2: 275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0496-1
Grasshoff M. 1984. Die Radnetzspinnen-Gattung Caerostris (Arachnida: Araneae). Revue zoologique Africaine 98: 725–765.
Gregorič M., Agnarsson I., Blackledge T.A. & Kuntner M. 2011a. Darwin’s bark spider: giant prey in giant orb webs (Caerostris darwini, Araneae: Araneidae)? Journal of Arachnology 39: 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1636/CB10-95.1
Gregorič M., Agnarsson I., Blackledge T.A. & Kuntner M. 2011b. How did the spider cross the river? Behavioral adaptations for river-bridging webs in Caerostris darwini (Araneae: Araneidae). PLoS ONE 6: e26847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026847
Gregorič M., Agnarsson I., Blackledge T.A. & Kuntner M. 2015a. Phylogenetic position and composition of Zygiellinae and Caerostris, with new insight into orb-web evolution and gigantism. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 175: 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12281
Gregorič M., Blackledge T.A., Agnarsson I. & Kuntner M. 2015b. A molecular phylogeny of bark spiders reveals new species from Africa and Madagascar (Araneae: Araneidae: Caerostris). Journal of Arachnology 43: 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202-43.3.293
Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L. & deWaard J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hedin M.C. & Maddison W.P. 2001. A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the lumping spider subfamily Dendryphantinae (Araneae : Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.0883
Htut K.Z., Alicea-Serrano A.M., Singla S., Agnarsson I., Garb J.E., Kuntner M., Gregorič M., Haney R.A., Marhabaie M., Blackledge T.A. & Dhinojwala A. 2021. Correlation between protein secondary structure and mechanical performance for the ultra-tough dragline silk of Darwin’s bark spider. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 18: e20210320. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2021.0320
Kapli P., Lutteropp S., Zhang J., Kobert K., Pavlidis P., Stamatakis A. & Flouri T. 2017. Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33: 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
Koch C.L. 1850. Übersicht des Arachnidensystems. Heft 5. J.L. Lotzbeck, Nürnberg. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.39561
Kono N., Ohtoshi R., Malay A.D., Mori M., Masunaga H., Yoshida Y., Nakamura H., Numata K. & Arakawa K. 2021. Darwin’s bark spider shares a spidroin repertoire with Caerostris extrusa but achieves extraordinary silk toughness through gene expression. Open Biology 11: e210242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.210242
Kuntner M. & Agnarsson I. 2010. Darwin’s bark spider: Web gigantism in a new species of bark spiders from Madagascar (Araneidae: Caerostris). Journal of Arachnology 38: 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1636/B09-113.1
Kuntner M. & Coddington J.A. 2020. Sexual size dimorphism: Evolution and perils of extreme phenotypes in spiders. Annual Review of Entomology 65: 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025032
Kuntner M., Coddington J.A. & Hormiga G. 2008. Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb-weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies. Cladistics 24: 147–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00176.x
Kuntner M., Agnarsson I. & Li D.Q. 2015. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders. Biological Reviews 90: 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12109
Kuntner M., Čandek K., Gregorič M., Turk E., Hamilton C.A., Chamberland L., Starrett J., Cheng R.C., Coddington J.A., Agnarsson I. & Bond J.E. 2023. Increasing information content and diagnosability in family-level classifications. Systematic Biology 72 (4): 964–971. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad021
Liu Y., Dietrich C., Braxton S. & Wang Y. 2019. Publishing trends and productivity in insect taxonomy from 1946 through 2012 based on an analysis of the Zoological Record for four species-rich families. European Journal of Taxonomy: 504. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.504
Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W. & Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010: 1–8. 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
Pocock R.I. 1902. Some new African spiders. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 10: 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930208678678
Puillandre N., Brouillet S. & Achaz G. 2021. ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. 21: 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281
Ratnasingham S. & Hebert P.D.N. 2007. bold: The Barcode of Life Data System. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355–364. Available from https://www.barcodinglife.org [accessed 22 Mar. 2025]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
Simon E. 1895. Histoire naturelle des araignées 1: 761–1084. Paris.
Sluys R. 2013. The unappreciated, fundamentally analytical nature of taxonomy and the implications for the inventory of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x
Strand E. 1915. Indoaustralische, papuanische und polynesische Spinnen des Senckenbergischen Museums, gesammelt von Dr E. Wolf, Dr J. Elbert u. a. In: Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Hanseatischen Südsee-Expedition 1909. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 36: 179–274.
Tamura K., Stecher G. & Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38 (7): 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
Thorell T. 1868. Araneae. Species novae minusve cognitae. In: Virgin C.A. (ed.) Kongliga Svenska Fregatten Eugenies Resa omkring Jorden: 1–34. Almqvist & Wiksells,Uppsala / Stockholm.
Vidergar N., Toplak N. & Kuntner M. 2014. Streamlining DNA barcoding protocols: Automated DNA extraction and a new cox1 primer in arachnid systematics. PLoS ONE: e113030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113030
Vinson A. 1863. Aranéides des Iles de La Réunion, Maurice et Madagascar. Librairie Classique Eugène Belin, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.125517
Walckenaer C.A. 1805. Tableau des Aranéides ou Caractères Essentiels des Tribus, Genres, Familles et Races que Renferme le Genre Aranea de Linné, avec la Désignation des Espèces Comprises dans Chacune de ces Divisions. Dentu, Paris.
Copyright (c) 2025 Matjaž Gregorič, Kuang-Ping Yu, Winny Rojas Velez, Jessica E. Garb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are NOT PERMITTED to post their submitted work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on personal websites) prior to publication, as it may lead to nomenclatural issues.
