A reassessment of the Neotropical genus Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895: cladistic analysis, biogeography, and taxonomic review (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae)

  • Luiz Felipe Moretti Iniesta Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0529-4162
  • Rodrigo Salvador Bouzan Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Antonio Domingos Brescovit Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brasil, 1500, 05503-090, São Paulo, Brazil
Keywords: Chaco subregion, cave, Schubart, Juliformia, Cambalidea, distribution, new species

Abstract

In order to provide a reassessment of the Neotropical genus Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895, a cladistic analysis, biogeographic analysis, and taxonomic review were conducted in the present work. For the cladistic approach, 91 morphological characters were scored for 53 terminals as the ingroup and 10 as the outgroup. Three synapomorphies support the monophyly of the genus: presence of a longitudinal suture on the promentum, penial bases partially fused, and the internal branch of the gonopods surrounding the telopodite; and two homoplastic transformations: the lateral lobe of the collum densely striated and setae present up to the apical portion of the prefemoral process on the first leg-pair of males. The genus Pseudonannolene is recovered as sister-group of Epinannolene Brölemann, 1903 (Pseudonannoleninae). A total of 226 occurrence points were recorded for Pseudonannolene, with the majority of records from the Chacoan subregion, composed by Araucaria Forest, Atlantic, and Parana Forest provinces. The biogeographical searches using the Geographically explicit Event Model recovered two biogeographic reconstructions (cost of 79 000), with the vicariance events occurring more frequently in the deep clades, whereas sympatry and points of sympatry occurred in more inclusive clades. The first reconstruction recovered four vicariances, 13 sympatries, 4 points of sympatry, and 21 founder events, and the second reconstruction recovered four vicariances, 12–13 sympatries, 4–5 points of sympatry, and 21 founder events. The genus Pseudonannolene comprises 56 species, including 8 new species herein described: P. alata sp. nov., P. aurea sp. nov., P. bucculenta sp. nov., P. curvata sp. nov., P. granulata sp. nov., P. insularis sp. nov., P. morettii sp. nov., and P. nicolau sp. nov.; P. brevis Silvestri, 1902 and P. rugosetta Silvestri, 1897 are regarded as species inquirendae; a neotype of P. alegrensis Silvestri, 1897 is here proposed with male described for the first time. The following taxa are synonymized: P. canastra Gallo & Bichuette, 2020 and P. saguassu Iniesta & Ferreira, 2013 with P. ambuatinga Iniesta & Ferreira, 2013; P. marconii Iniesta & Ferreira, 2013 with P. longicornis (Porat, 1888); P. chaimowiczi Fontanetti, 1996, P. gogo Iniesta & Ferreira, 2013, P. rosineii Iniesta & Ferreira, 2014, P. taboa Iniesta & Ferreira, 2014, and P. longissima Iniesta & Ferreira, 2014 with P. microzoporus Mauriès, 1987; P. tricolor gracilis Brölemann, 1902 and P. tricolor rugosus Schubart, 1945 with P. tricolor Brölemann, 1902; P. auguralis Silvestri, 1902 with P. rocana Silvestri, 1902; and P. abbreviata Silvestri, 1902 with P. typica Silvestri, 1895. P. inops Brölemann, 1929 is proposed here as new status from P. bovei inops. A dichotomous identification key is presented to facilitate the species identification.

References

Akkari N. & Enghoff H. 2012. Review of the genus Ommatoiulus in Andalusia, Spain (Diplopoda: Julida) with description of ten new species and notes on a remarkable gonopod structure, the fovea. Zootaxa 3538: 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00229.x

Akkari N., Gilgado J.D., Ortuño V.M. & Enghoff H. 2018. Out of the dark void: Ommatoiulus longicornis n. sp., a new julid from Spain (Diplopoda, Julida) with notes on some troglobiomorphic traits in millipedes. Zootaxa 4420: 415–429. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4420.3.7

Álvares E.S.S. & Ferreira R.L. 2002. Coarazuphium pains, a new species of troglobitic beetle from Brazil (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Zuphiini). Lundiana 3(1): 41–43.

Arias J.S. 2017. An event model for phylogenetic biogeography using explicitly geographical ranges. Journal of Biogeography 44: 2225–2235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13024

Arias J.S., Szumik C.A. & Goloboff P.A. 2011. Spatial analysis of vicariance: a method for using direct geographical information in historical biogeography. Cladistics 27: 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00353.x

Attems C. 1926. Myriopoda. In: Kükenthal W. (ed.) Handbuch der Zoologie 4 (1): 1–402.

Ázara L.N. & Ferreira R.L. 2014. Two new troglobitic Newportia (Newportia) from Brazil (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha). Zootaxa 3881 (3): 267–278. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3881.3.5

Barbo F.E., Nogueira C.C. & Sawaya R.J. 2021. Vicariance and regionalization patterns in snakes of the South American Atlantic Forest megadiverse hotspot. Journal of Biogeography 48 (4): 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14040

Barcia D.L., DaSilva M.B., Conti L.A. & Carbayo F. 2020. Areas of endemism of land planarians (Platyhelminthes: Tricladida) in the Southern Atlantic Forest. PLoS ONE 15 (7): e0235949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235949

Batista C.B., Lima I.P. & Lima M.R. 2021. Beta diversity patterns of bats in the Atlantic Forest: how does the scale of analysis affect the importance of spatial and environmental factors? Journal of Biogeography 48 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13928

Bichuette M.E., Simões L.B., Zepon T., von Schimonsky D.M. & Gallão J.E. 2019. Richness and taxonomic distinctness of cave invertebrates from the northeastern state of Goiás, central Brazil: a vulnerable and singular area. Subterranean Biology 29: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.29.30418

Boock O.J. & Lordello L.G.E. 1952. Diplópoda depredador de tubérculos de batatinha. Bragantia 12 (10–12): 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87051952000400006

Bouzan R.S., Iniesta L.F.M., de Souza C.A.R., Zampaulo R.A. & Brescovit A.D. 2019a. Taxonomic review of the Amazonian millipede genus Parastenonia Hoffman, 1977 and description of a new species from iron-ore caves (Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae). Journal of Natural History 53 (45–46): 2781–2799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1749956

Bouzan R.S., Iniesta L.F.M. & Brescovit A.D. 2019b. Cladistic analysis and description of a new species of the Brazilian genus Atlantodesmus Hoffman, 2000 (Diplopoda: Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 538: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2019.538

Bouzan R.S., Iniesta L.F.M. & Brescovit A.D. 2021. Cladistic analysis and taxonomic review of the millipede tribe Arthrosolaenomeridini Hoffman, 1976 (Polydesmida: Chelodesmidae). Zootaxa 4970 (2): 201–256. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4970.2.1

Bornschein M.R., Firkowski C.R., Belmonte-Lopes R., Corrêa L., Ribeiro L.F., Morato S.A.A., Antoniazzi-Jr R.L., Reinert B.L., Meyer A.L.S., Cini F.A. & Pie M.R. 2016. Geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. PeerJ 4: e2490. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2490

Brazeau M.D. 2011. Problematic character coding methods in morphology and their effects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 104 (3): 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01755.x

Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (4): 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x

Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 (3): 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00179.x

Brölemann H.W. 1902a. Myriapodes du Musée de Sao Paulo. Revista do Museu Paulista 5: 35–237. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.9824

Brölemann H.W. 1902b. Myriapodes recueillis par M.E. Gounolle au Brésil. Annales de la Société entomologique de France 71: 649–694. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8252053 [accessed 10 Feb. 2023].

Brölemann H.W. 1903. Myriapodes recueillis au Pará par Monsieur le Prof. E.A. Goeldi, Directeur du Musée. Zoologischer Anzeiger 26 (691): 177–196.

Brölemann H.W. 1904. Myriapodes du Museu Paulista, IIe mémorie: Manaos. Revista do Museu Paulista 6: 63–96. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.26467

Brölemann H.W. 1909. Os Myriapodos do Brazil. Catalogos da Fauna Brazileira. Museu Paulista, São Paulo, Brasil.

Brölemann H.W. 1919. Myriapodes. Mission du Service géographique de l’armée pour la mesure d’un Arc de méridien équatorial en Amérique du Sud sous le contrôle scientifique de l’Académie des Sciences, 1899-1906 10: 235–275. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.980

Brölemann H.W. 1920. Diplopoda. In: Voyage de Ch. Alluaud et R. Jeannel en Afrique Orientale (1911–1912). Résultats scientifiques. Myriapoda, III. L. Lhomme, Paris. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.152165

Brölemann H.W. 1929. Myriapodes recueillis aus Brésil par M. le professeur Caullery, membre de l’institut. Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France 29 (1): 1–37.

Bueno-Villegas J., Sierwald P. & Monteros A.E. 2008. Phylogeny of the millipede genus Sphaeriodesmus Peters, 1864 (Polydesmida: Sphaeriodesmidae) based on morphological characters. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 8: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2007.03.001

Calvanese V.C., Brescovit A.D. & Bonato L. 2019. Revision of the Neotropical species of Aphilodontinae (Geophilomorpha, Geophilidae), with eight new species and a first phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily. Zootaxa 4698 (1): 1–72. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4698.1.1

Campos K.A. & Fontanetti C.S. 2004. Chromosomal characterization of Pseudonannolene strinatii (Spirostreptida, Pseudonannolenidae). Iheringia 94 (1): 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212004000100009

Carl J. 1913a. Diplopodenstudien I. Die Gonopoden von Epinannolene und Pseudonannolene. Zoologischer Anzeiger 42: 174–177.

Carl J. 1913b. Diplopodenstudien II. Eine neue Physiostreptiden-Gattung. Zoologischer Anzeiger 42 (5): 212–216.

Carl J. 1914. Die Diplopoden von Columbien nebst Beiträgen zur Morphologic der Stemmatoiuliden. Memoires de la Société neuchâteloise des Sciences naturelles 5: 821–993.

Chagas-Jr A. & Bichuette M.E. 2018. A synopsis of centipedes in Brazilian caves: hidden species diversity that needs conservation (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). ZooKeys 737: 13–56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.737.20307

Chamberlin R.V. 1918. Myriapods from Nashville, Tennessee. Psyche 25: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1155/1918/65230

Chamberlin R.V. 1922. Notes on West Indian millipeds. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 61 (10): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.61-2431.1

Cook O.F. 1895. Introductory note on the families of Diplopoda. In: Cook O.F. & Collins G.N. (eds) The Craspedosomatidae of North America. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 9. New York Academy of Sciences, New York.

Culver D.C. & Shear W.A. 2012. Myriapods. In: White W.B.& Culver D.C. (eds) Encyclopodia of Caves: 538–541. Academic Press, Chennai. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-383832-2.00078-5

Dauby G., Stévart T., Droissart V., Cosiaux A., Deblauwe V., Simo-Droissart M., Sosef M.S.M., Lowry II P.P., Schatz G.E., Gereau R.E. & Couvreur T.L.P. 2017. ConR: an R package to assist large-scale multispecies preliminary conservation assessments using distribution data. Ecology and Evolution 7 (24): 11292–11303. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3704

de Pinna M.C.C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7 (4): 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1991.tb00045.x

Deharveng L. & Bedos A. 2018. Diversity of terrestrial invertebrates in subterranean habitats. In: Moldovan O.T., Kovác L. & Halse S. (eds) Cave Ecology. Ecological Studies. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98852-8_7

Demange J.-M. 1964. Les appendices postériqueurs (9e paire) du diplopsegment gonopodial (VIIe) des Spirostreptoidea (Myriapodes Diplopodes). Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 2e série 36: 191–210.

Desutter-Grandcolas L., D’Haese C. & Robillarda T. 2003. The problem of characters susceptible to parallel evolution in phylogenetic analysis: a reply to Marquès and Gnaspini (2001) with emphasis on cave life phenotypic evolution. Cladistics 19: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2003.tb00301.x

Enghoff H. 1981. A cladistic analysis and classification of the millipede order Julida. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 19: 285–319.

Enghoff H. 1991. A revised cladistic analysis and classification of the millipede order Julida with establishment of four new families and description of a new nemasomatoid genus from Japan. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 29: 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1991.tb00671.x

Enghoff H. 1992. The size of a millipede. In: Meyer E., Thaler K. & Schedl W. (ed.) Advances in Myriapodology. Berichte des naturwissenschaftlich-medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck Suppl. 10: 47–56.

Enghoff H. 1995. A revision of the Paectophyllini and Calyptophyllini: millipedes of the Middle East (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae). Journal of Natural History 29: 685–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939500770241

Enghoff H. 1996. The penis as a phylogenetic character in the millipede family Julida. Mémoires du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle N.S. 169: 313–326.

Enghoff H. & Reboleira A.S.P.S. 2017. Diversity of non-Laboulbenialean fungi on millipedes. Studies in Fungi 2 (1): 130–137. https://doi.org/10.5943/sif/2/1/15

Enghoff H. & Reboleira A.S.P.S. 2020. The first blind spirostreptid millipede, found in a cave in Morocco; with notes on the genus Odontostreptus Attems, 1914 (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 668: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.668

Enghoff H., Golovatch S.I., Short M., Stoev P. & Wesener T. 2015. Diplopoda – Taxonomic overview. In: Minelli A. (ed.) Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda Vol. 2: 363–453. Brill, Leiden and Boston. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004188273_017

Escapa I.H. & Catalano S.A. 2013. Phylogenetic analysis of Araucariaceae: integrating molecules, morphology, and fossils. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174 (8): 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.1086/672369

Ferrer J., Wingert J.M. & Malabarba L.R. 2014. Description of a new species and phylogenetic analysis of the subtribe Cynopoecilina, including continuous characters without discretization (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172: 846–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12190

Fitch W.M. 1971. Toward defining course of evolution minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/20.4.406

Fleming K., Johnston P., Zwartz D., Yokoyama Y., Lambeck K. & Chappell J. 1998. Refining the eustatic sea-level curve since the Last Glacial Maximum using farand intermediate-field sites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 163: 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00198-8

Fontanetti C.S. 1990. Meiotic prophase in Diplopoda. Revista Brasileira de Genética 13 (4): 697–703.

Fontanetti C.S. 1996. Description of three cave diplopods of Pseudonannolene Silvestri (Diplopoda, Pseudonannolenida, Pseudonannolenidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 13 (2): 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751996000200013

Fontanetti C.S. 2000. Description and chromosome number of a species of Pseudonannolene Silvestri (Arthropoda, Diplopoda, Pseudonannolenidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 17 (1): 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752000000100014

Fontanetti C.S. 2002. Taxonomic importance of the prefemoral process of the first pair of legs in males of the genus Pseudonannolene (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida). Folia Biologica (Cracow) 50 (3–4): 199–202.

Fontanetti C.S., Udulutsch R.G. & Pietrobon T.A.O. 2003. A new species of cave milipede of genus Pseudonannolene (Diplopoda): description and karyotype. Periódico de Biociências: secção Zoologia, Rio Grande do Sul 11 (1): 65–68.

Freitas V.C., David J.A. & Fontanetti C.S. 2004. Caverna da Toca: comportamento e biologia do diplopodo Pseudonannolene tocaiensis Fontanetti, 1996 (Spirotreptida). O Carste (Belo Horizonte) 16 (2): 38–42.

Gallão J.E. & Bichuette M.E. 2018. Brazilian obligatory subterranean fauna and threats to the hypogean environment. ZooKeys 746: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.746.15140

Gallo J.S. & Bichuette M.E. 2017. Is there correlation between photophobia and troglomorphism in Neotropical cave millipedes (Spirostreptida, Pseudonannolenidae)? Zoomorphology 137 (2): 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-017-0389-0

Gallo J.S. & Bichuette M.E. 2019. O que mudou na distribuição dos diplópodes Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895 nas cavernas do Brasil 18 anos após a sinopse de Trajano e colaboradores (2000)?. Espeleo-Tema 29 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.1.e30225

Gallo J.S. & Bichuette M.E. 2020. Pseudonannolene canastra sp. nov. (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida) – A new troglobitic millipede from the southwestern state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Subterranean Biology 35: 33–47. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.35.51183

Gatesy J., Matthee C., Desalle R. & Hayashi C. 2002. Resolution of a supertree/supermatrix paradox. Systematic Biology 51: 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150290102311

Giribet G. 2003. Stability in phylogenetic formulations and its relationship to nodal support. Systematic Biology 52 (4): 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390223730

Goloboff P.A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00209.x

Goloboff P.A. 2008. Calculating SPR distances between trees. Cladistics 24: 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00189.x

Goloboff P.A. & Catalano S.A. 2010. Phylogenetic morphometrics (II): algorithms for landmark optimization. Cladistics 26: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00302.x

Goloboff P.A. & Catalano S.A. 2016. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32: 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160

Goloboff P.A. & Farris J.S. 2001. Methods for quick consensus estimation. Cladistics 17: 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00102.x

Goloboff P.A., Mattoni C.I. & Quinteros A.S. 2006. Continuous characters analyzed as such. Cladistics 22: 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00122.x

Goloboff P.A., Farris J. & Nixon K. 2008. TNT: a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00189.x

Goloboff P.A., Galvis A.T. & Arias J.S. 2018. Parsimony and model-based phylogenetic methods for morphological data: comments on O'Reilly et al. Paleontology 61: 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12353

Golovatch S.I., Hoffman R.L., Adis J., Marques A.D., Raizer J., Silva F.H.O., Ribeiro R.A.K., Silva J.L. & Pinheiro T.G. 2005. Millipedes (Diplopoda) of the Brazilian Pantanal. Amazoniana 18 (3/4): 273–288.

Goodman M., Olson C.B., Beeber J.E. & Czelusniak J. 1982. New perspectives in the molecular biological analysis of mammalian phylogeny. Acta Zoologica Fennica 169: 19–35.

Grant T. & Kluge A.G. 2008a. Clade support measures and their adequacy. Cladistics 24: 1051–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00231.x

Grant T. & Kluge A.G. 2008b. Credit where credit is due: the Goodman-Bremer support metric. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 405–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.04.023

Hijmans R.J., Cruz M., Rojas E. & Guarino L. 2001. DIVA–GIS, Version 1.4. A Geographic Information System for the Management and Analysis of Genetic Resources Data. Manual. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

Hinchliff C.E. & Roalson E.H. 2013. Using supermatrices for phylogenetic inquiry: an example using the sedges. Systematic Biology 62: 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys088

Hoffman R.L. 1965. A second species in the diplopod genus Choctella (Spirostreptidfa: Choctellidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 78: 55–58. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34562389 [accessed 21 Feb. 2023].

Hoffman R.L. 1980. Classification of the Diplopoda. Múseum d’histoire naturelle, Genève.

Hoffman R.L. 1981. Chelodesmid studies. XVII. Synopsis of the tribe Platinodesmini, with the proposal of two new genera. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 36 (2): 85–95.

Hoffman R.L. 1982. Chelodesmid studies. XVIII. A synopsis of the genus Sandalodesmus Silvestri, 1902, and proposal of the new tribe Sandalodesmini. Spixiana 5 (3): 247–259.

Hoffman R.L. 1984. A new species of Epinannolene from the Amazon Basin, Brazil (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Myriapodologica 1 (13): 91–94.

Hoffman R.L. 1990. Myriapoda IV. Polydesmida: Oxydesmidae. Das Tierreich 107: 1–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110744989

Hoffman R.L. 1999. Checklist of the Millipedes of North and Middle America. Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication 8: 1–584

Hoffman R.L. & Florez E. 1995. The milliped genus Phallorthus revalidated: another facet of a taxonomic enigma (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Myriapodologica 3 (13): 115–126.

Hoffman R.L., Golovatch, S.I., Adis J. & de Morais J.W. 1996. Practical keys to the orders and families of millipedes of the Neotropical region (Myriapoda: Diplopoda). Amazoniana 14 (1–2): 1–35.

Hoffman R.L., Golovatch S.I., Adis J. & de Morais J.W. 2002. Diplopoda. In: Adis J. (ed.) Amazonian Arachnida and Myriapoda: 505–533. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow.

Hollier J., Schiller E. & Akkari N. 2017. An annotated list of the Diplopoda described by Aloïs Humbert alone and with Henri de Saussure, and the Diplopoda from Saussure’s Mexico expedition. Revue suisse de Zoologie 124 (2): 203–224. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.893503

Hovenkamp P. 1997. Vicariance events, not areas, should be used in biogeographical analysis. Cladistics 13: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00241.x

Hovenkamp P. 2001. A direct method for the analysis of vicariance patterns. Cladistics 17: 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/clad.2001.0176

Humphries C.J. 2004. Homology, characters and continuous variables. In: MacLeod N. & Forey P.L. (eds) Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny: 8–26. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203165171.ch2

Iniesta L.F.M & Ferreira R.L. 2013a. The first troglobitic Pseudonannolene from Brazilian iron ore caves (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Zootaxa 3669 (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3669.1.9

Iniesta L.F.M & Ferreira R.L. 2013b. Two new species of Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895 from Brazilian limestone caves (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae): synotopy of a troglophilic and a troglobiotic species. Zootaxa 3702 (4): 357–369. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3702.4.3

Iniesta L.F.M & Ferreira R.L. 2013c. Two new species of Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895 from Brazilian iron ore caves (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Zootaxa 3716 (1): 75–80. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3716.1.6

Iniesta L.F.M & Ferreira R.L. 2014. New species of Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895 from Brazilian limestone caves with comments on the potential distribution of the genus in South America (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Zootaxa 3846 (3): 361–397. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3846.3.3

Iniesta L.F.M & Ferreira R.L. 2015. Pseudonannolene lundi n. sp., a new troglobitic millipede from a Brazilian limestone cave (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). Zootaxa 3949 (1): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3949.1.6

Iniesta L.F.M., Bouzan R.S. & Brescovit A.D. 2019. On the millipede genus Heteropyge: description of the adults of H. araguayensis and revalidation of H. bidens (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae). Iheringia, Série Zoologia 109: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2019032

Iniesta L.F.M., Enghoff H., Brescovit A.D. & Bouzan R.S. 2020. Phylogenetic placement of the monotypic genus Holopodostreptus Carl, 1913 and notes on the systematics of Pseudonannolenidae (Spirostreptida: Cambalidea). Invertebrate Systematics 34: 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS20012

Jeekel C.A.W. 1963. Diplopoda of Guiana (1–5). In: Gijskes D.C.& Hummelinck P.W. (eds) Studies on the Fauna of Suriname and Other Guyanas No. 11: 1–157. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.

Jeekel C.A.W. 1965. A revision of the South American Paradoxosomatidae in the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale Giacomo Doria 75: 99–125. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/35589326 [accessed 21 Feb. 2023].

Jeekel C.A.W. 1970 [1971]. Nomenclator generum et familiarum Diplopodorum: a list of the genus and family-group names in the Class Diplopoda from the 10th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Monografieën van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging 5 (1–12): 1–412.

Jeekel C.A.W. 1985. The distribution of the Diplochaeta and the “lost” continente Pacifica (Diplopoda). Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 55 (1): 100–112.

Jeekel C.A.W. 2004. A bibliographic catalogue of the “Cambaloidea” (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida). Myriapod Memoranda 7: 43–109.

Junta V.G.P., Castro-Souza R.A. & Ferreira R.L. 2020. Five new species of Phalangopsis Serville, 1831 (Orthoptera: Phalangopsidae) from Brazilian caves in the Amazon Forest. Zootaxa 4859 (2): 151–194. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4859.2.1

Karam-Gemael M., Izzo T.J. & Chagas-Jr A. 2018. Why be red listed? Threatened Myriapoda species in Brazil with implications for their conservation. ZooKeys 741: 255–269. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21971

Karanovic T., Lee S. & Lee W. 2018. Instant taxonomy: choosing adequate characters for species delimitation and description through congruence between molecular data and quantitative shape analysis. Invertebrate Systematics 32: 551–580. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS17002

Kitching I.J., Forey P.L., Humphries C.J. & Williams D.M. 1998. Cladistics. Second Edition. The theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. The Systematics Association Publication no. 11. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.

Koch M. 2015. General morphology. In: Minelli A. (ed.) Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda Vol. 2: 7–67. Leiden and Boston, Brill.

Koch N.M., Soto I.M. & Ramírez M.J. 2014. First phylogenetic analysis of the family Neriidae (Diptera), with a study on the issue of scaling continuous characters. Cladistics 3: 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS17002

Koch N.M., Soto I.M & Ramírez M.J. 2015. Overcoming problems with the use of ratios as continuous characters for phylogenetic analyses. Zoologica Scripta 44 (5): 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12120

Korsós Z. & Johns P.M. 2009. Introduction to the taxonomy of Iulomorphidae of New Zealand, with descriptions of two new species of Eumastigonus Chamberlin, 1920 (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Epinannolenidea). Zootaxa 2065: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2065.1.1

Korsós Z. & Read H.J. 2012. Redescription of Zinagon chilensis (Silvestri, 1903) from Chile, with a species list of Iulomorphidae from the Southern Hemisphere (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Epinannolenidea). Zootaxa 3493: 39–48. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3493.1.4

Krabbe E. 1982. Systematik der Spirostreptidae (Diplopoda, Spirostreptomorpha). Abhandlungen und Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg 24: 1–476.

Liu W. & Wynne J.J. 2019. Cave millipede diversity with the description of six new species from Guangxi, China. Subterranean Biology 30: 57–94. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.30.35559

Liu W., Golovatch S.I., Wesener T. & Tian M. 2017. Convergent evolution of unique morphological adaptations to a subterranean environment in cave millipedes (Diplopoda). PLoS ONE 12 (2): e0170717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170717

Loomis H.F. 1941. New genera and species of Millipeds from the Southern peninsula of Haiti. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 31: 188–195.

Loomis H.F. 1962. Two unusual Central American spirostreptid millipede species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 75: 47–52.

Lordello L.G.E. 1954. Observação sobre alguns Diplópodos de interesse agrícola. Anais da Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” 11: 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0071-12761954000100004

Löwenberg-Neto P. 2014. Neotropical region: a shapefile of Morrone’s (2014) biogeographical regionalisation. Zootaxa 3802 (2): 300. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3802.2.12

Maddison W.P. 1993. Missing data versus missing sharacters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42 (4): 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.4.576

Magalhães I.L.F & Ramírez M.J. 2017. Relationships and phylogenetic revision of Filistatinella spiders (Araneae: Filistatidae). Cladistics 3: 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS16083

Marques A.C. & Gnaspini P. 2001. The problem of characters susceptible to parallel evolution in phylogenetic reconstructions: suggestion of a practical method and its application to cave animals. Cladistics 17: 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00131.x

Martin L., Morner N.A., Flexor J.M. & Suguio K. 1986. Fundamentos e reconstrução de antigos níveis marinhos do Quaternário. Boletim do Instituto de Geociências, Publicacão Especial 4: 1–161. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-8078.v0i4p01-161

Mauriès J-P. 1974. Un cambalide cavernicole du Brésil, Pseudonannolene strinatii n. sp. (Myriapoda–Diplopoda). Revue suisse de Zoologie 81 (2): 545–550. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.146025

Mauriès J-P. 1977. Le genre Glyphiulus Gervais, 1847, et sa place dans la classification des Cambalides, à propos de la description d’une nouvelle espèce du Viêt-Nam (Diplopoda, lulida, Cambalidea). Bulletin du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (3) 431: 243–250.

Mauriès J-P. 1980. Diplopdes Chilognathes de la Guadeloupe et ses dépendances. Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 4e série, Section A, Zoologie 2: 1059–1111.

Mauriès J-P. 1983. Cambalides nouveaux ou peu connus d’Asie, d’Amérique et d’Oceanie. I. Cambalidae et Cambalopsidae (Myriapoda, Diplopoda). Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 4e série, Section A, Zoologie 5 (A, 1): 247–276.

Mauriès J-P. 1987. Cambalides nouveaux et peu connus d’Asie, d’Amérique et d’Océanie. II. Pseudonannolenidae, Choctellidae (Myriapoda, Diplopoda). Bulletin du Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, 4e série, Section A, Zoologie 9 (1): 169–199.

Mauriès J-P. & Enghoff, H. 1990. A new genus of cambaloid millipedes from Vietnam (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Cambalopsidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 21: 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631290X00076

Mauriès J-P. & Geoffroy J.-J. 2000. Nouvelle description, classification, répartition et variations morphologiques interpopulations d’un diplopode troglobie du sud-est du Brésil (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Chelodesmidae). Zoosystema 22 (1): 153–168.

Mesibov R. 2017a. Iulomorphid millipedes (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Iulomorphidae) of Tasmania, Australia. ZooKeys 652: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.652.12035

Mesibov R. 2017b. A new and unusual species of Amastigogonus Brölemann, 1913 from Tasmania, Australia (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Iulomorphidae). ZooKeys 687: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.687.14872

Mesibov R. 2019. Cambaloid millipedes of Tasmania, Australia, with remarks on family-level classification and descriptions of two new genera and four new species (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida). ZooKeys 827: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.827.32969

Miyoshi A.R., Gabriel V.A., Fantazzini E.R. & Fontanetti C.S. 2005. Microspines in the pylorus of Pseudonannolene tricolor and Rhinocricus padbergi (Arthropoda, Diplopoda). Iheringia, Série Zoologia 95 (2): 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212005000200008

Morrone J.J. 2014. Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 3782 (1): 1–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1

Mwabvu T., Hamer M.L. & Slotow R.H. 2007. A taxonomic review of the southern African millipede genus, Bicoxidens Attems, 1928 (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Spirostreptidae), with the description of three new species and a tentative phylogeny. Zootaxa 1452: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1452.1.1

Mwabvu T., Hamer M.L., Slotow R.H. & Barraclough D. 2010. A revision of the taxonomy and distribution of Archispirostreptus Silvestri 1895 (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Spirostreptidae), and description of a new spirostreptid genus with three new species. Zootaxa 2567: 1–49. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2567.1.1

Nasserzadeh, H., Alipanah H. & Gilasian E. 2017. Phylogenetic study of the genus Sternolophus Solier (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) based on adult morphology. ZooKeys 712: 69–85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.712.14085

Nixon K.C. 1999–2004. Winclada (BETA) ver. ASADO 1.89. Published by the author, Ithaca, New York, NY.

Oliveira R.R.M., Vasconcelos S., Pires E.S., Pietrobon T., Prous X. & Oliveira G. 2019. Complete mitochondrial genomes of three troglophile cave spiders (Mesabolivar, Pholcidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources 4 (1): 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2018.1547139

Parizotto D.R., Pires A.C., Mise K.M., Ferreira R.L. & Sessegolo G.C. 2017. Troglobitic invertebrates: Improving the knowledge on the Brazilian subterranean biodiversity through an interactive multi-entry key. Zootaxa 4365 (4): 401–409. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.4.1

Pellegrini T.G., Ferreira R.L., Zampaulo R.A. & Vieira L. 2020. Coarazuphium lundi (Carabidae: Zuphiini), a new Brazilian troglobitic beetle, with the designation of a neotype for C. pains Álvares & Ferreira, 2002. Zootaxa 4878 (2): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4878.2.4

Pena-Barbosa J.P.P., Sierwald P. & Brescovit A.D. 2013. On the largest chelodesmid millipedes: taxonomic review and cladistic analysis of the genus Odontopeltis Pocock, 1894 (Diplopoda; Polydesmida; Chelodesmidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 169 (4): 737–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12086

Penteado C.H.S. & Hebling-Beraldo M.J.A. 1991. Respiratore response is a Brazilian millipede, Pseudonannolene tricolor, to declining oxygen pressures. Physiological Zoology 64 (1): 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.64.1.30158521

Pimvichai P., Enghoff H. & Panha S. 2009a. A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part 1: the T. opinatus subgroup (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae). Zootaxa 2016: 17–50. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2016.1.2

Pimvichai P., Enghoff H. & Panha S. 2009b. A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part 2: the T. bifurcus subgroup (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae). Zootaxa 2165: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2165.1.1

Pimvichai P., Enghoff H. & Panha S. 2010. The Rhynchoproctinae, a south-east Asiatic subfamily of giant millipedes: cladistic analysis, classification, four new genera and a deviating new species from north-west Thailand (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae). Invertebrate Systematics 24: 51–80. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS09052

Pimvichai P., Enghoff H. & Panha S. 2011a. A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part 3: the T. induratus subgroup (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae). Zootaxa 2941: 47–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2941.1.3

Pimvichai P., Enghoff H. & Panha S. 2011b. A revision of the Thyropygus allevatus group. Part 4: the T. cuisinieri subgroup (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Harpagophoridae). Zootaxa 2980: 37–48. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2980.1.3

Pinto-da-Rocha R. 1995. Sinopse da fauna cavernícola do Brasil (1907–1994). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 39 (6): 61–172.

Pinto-da-Rocha R., Dasilva M.B. & Bragagnolo C. 2005. Faunistic similarity and historical biogeography of the harvestmen of southern and southeastern Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil. Journal of Arachnology 33: 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1636/04-114.1

Porat C.O. Von. 1888. Über einige exotische Iuliden des Brüsseler-Museums. Annales de la Société entomologique de Belgique 32: 205–256.

R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.Rproject.org/.270 [accessed 21 Feb. 2023].

Rae T.C. 2004. Scaling, polymorphism and cladistic analysis. In: MacLeod N. & Forey P.L. (eds) Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny: 45–52. Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203165171.ch4

Reboleira A.S.P.S., Malek-Hosseini M.J., Sadeghi S. & Enghoff E. 2015. Highly disjunct and highly infected millipedes – A new cave-dwelling species of Chiraziulus (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Cambalidae) from Iran and notes on Laboulbeniales ectoparasites. European Journal of Taxonomy 146: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2015.146

Rieppel, O. & Kearney, M. 2002. Similarity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75 (1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00006.x

Rodrigues B.V.B., Cizauskas I. & Rheims C.A. 2018. Description of Paracymbiomma gen. nov., a new genus of prodidomid spiders from the Neotropical region (Araneae: Prodidomidae) including a new troglobite species. Zootaxa 4514 (3): 301–331. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4514.3.1

Rodrigues D.J., Izzo T.J. & Battirola L.D. 2011. Descobrindo a Amazônia Meridional: biodiversidade da Fazenda São Nicolau. Pau e Prosa Comunicação Ltda., Cuiabá-MT.

Rodrigues D.J., Vaz-De-Mello F.Z. & Silveira R.M. 2019. Biodiversity studies through public-private partnership (PPP): the case of Fazenda São Nicolau in the northwest of Mato Grosso. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 91: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920190097

Rodrigues P.E.S., Campos L.A., Ott R. & Rodrigues E.N.L. 2019. Phylogeny of three species groups of Rhinocricus Karsch, 1881 based on morphological characters (Diplopoda, Spirobolida, Rhinocricidae). Organisms Diversity & Evolution 20: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00421-3

Schubart O. 1942. Os Myriápodes e suas relaçóes com a agricultura – Com uma bibliografia completa sôbre o assunto. Papéis avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia 2 (16): 205–234.

Schubart O. 1944. Os Diplopodos de Pirassununga. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 2: 321–440.

Schubart O. 1945a. Diplópodos de Monte Alegre. Papéis avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia 6 (23): 283–320.

Schubart O. 1945b. Sobre os representantes Brasileiros da familia Spirostreptidae. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 17: 51–87.

Schubart O. 1947. Os diplopodos da viagem do naturalista Antenor Leitao de Carvalho aos rios Araguaia e Amazonas em 1939 e 1940. Boletim do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro / Zoologia 82: 1–74.

Schubart O. 1949. Os diplopoda de algumas ilhas do litoral paulista. Memórias do Instituto Butantan 21: 203–254.

Schubart O. 1952. Diplopoda de Pirassununga IV. Adenda à fauna regional. Dusenia 3 (6): 403–420.

Schubart O. 1958. Sôbre alguns Diplopoda de Mato Grosso e Goiás, Brasil e a família Spirostreptidae. Arquivos do Museu Nacional 46: 203–252.

Schubart O. 1960. Novas especies brasileiras das familias Spirostreptidae e Pseudonannolenidae (Diplopoda, Opistospermophora). Actas da Sociedade de Biologia do Rio de Janeiro 4 (6): 74–79.

Sereno P.C. 2007. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics 23: 565–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00161.x

Shear W.A. 1969. A synopsis of the cave millipeds of the United States, with an illustrated key to genera. Psyche 76 (2): 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1155/1969/70437

Shear W.A. 1973a. Jarmilka alba, n. gen., n. sp. (Diplopoda: Spirostreptida: Cambalidae), a new millipede from a cave in Belize. Association for Mexican Cave Studies Bulletin 5: 43–45.

Shear W.A. 1973b. Millipeds (Diplopoda) from Mexican and Guatemalan caves. Accademia, Nazionale dei Lincei, Problemi Attuali di Scienza e di Cultura 171 (2): 239–305.

Shelley R.M. 2002. A revised, annotated, family-level classification of the Diplopoda. Arthropoda Selecta 11 (3): 187–207.

Shelley R.M. & Golovatch S.I. 2015. Nomenclator generum et familiarum diplopodorum III. A lista of the genus-, family-, and ordinal-group names proposed in the Class Diplopoda from 1 January 2000–31 December 2014. Arthropoda Selecta 24 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15298/arthsel.24.1.01

Sierwald P. & Reft A.J. 2004. The millipede collections of the world. Fieldiana, N.S.103 (1532): 1–100.

Silva J.M.C., Sousa M.C. & Castelletti C.H.M. 2004. Areas of endemism for passerine birds in the Atlantic forest, South America. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00077.x

Silvestri F. 1895a. Chilopodi e diplopodi raccolti dal capitano G. Bove e dal Prof. L. Balzan nell’America meridionale. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale di Genova, serie 2 (14): 764–783. Available from http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7940804 [accessed 13 Feb. 2023].

Silvestri F. 1895b. Viaggio del dottor Alfredo Borelli nella Repubblica Argentina e nel Paraguay. XIV. Chilopodi e Diplopodi. Bollettino del musei di zoologia e di anatomia comparata della Reale Università di Torino 10 (203): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.8048

Silvestri F. 1896. I Diplopodi. Parte I. – Sistematica. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale di Genova, serie 2 (16): 121–254. Available from https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7697911 [accessed 13 Feb. 2023].

Silvestri F. 1897a. Systema Diplopodum. Annali del Museo civico di storia naturale di Genova, serie 2 (18): 644–651. Available from https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7785907 [accessed 13 Feb. 2023].

Silvestri F. 1897b. Viaggio del Dott. Alfredo Borelli nel Chaco boliviano e nella Repubblica Argentina. IV. Chilopodi e Diplopod. Bollettino del musei di zoologia e di anatomia comparata della Reale Università di Torino 12 (283): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.4564

Silvestri F. 1897c. Neue Diplopoden. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Königlichen Zoologischen und Anthropologisch-Ethnographischen Museums zu Dresden 6 (9): 1–23.

Silvestri F. 1897d. Description des especes nouvelles de Myriapodes du Musee royal d’Histoire naturelle de Bruxelles. Annales de la Société entomologique de Belgique 41: 345–362.

Silvestri F. 1902. Viaggio del Dr. A. Borelli nel Matto Grosso. VII. Diplopodi. Bollettino del musei di zoologia e di anatomia comparata della Reale Università di Torino 17 (432): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.26628

Silvestri F. 1903. Classis Diplopoda, Vol. I – Anatome, Pars la – Segmenta, Tegumentum, Musculi. In: Berlese A. (ed.) Acari Myriopoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta 346: 1–272.

Sket B. 2008. Can we agree on an ecological classification of subterranean animals? Journal of Natural History 42: 1549–1563. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00222930801995762

Somer K.M. 1986. Multivariate allometry and removal of size with principal components analysis. Systematic Biology 35 (3): 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/35.3.359

Souza T.S., Prado R.A. & Fontanetti C.S. 2012. High content of constitutive heterochromatin in two species of Pseudonannolene (Diplopoda). Caryologia 58 (1): 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2005.10589431

Strong E.E. & Lipscomb D. 1999. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15: 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00272.x

Su Y.N. 2016. A simple and quick method of displaying liquid-preserved morphological structures for microphotography. Zootaxa 4208 (6): 592–593. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4208.6.6

Thiele K. 1993. The Holy Grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 9: 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1993.tb00226.x

Trajano E. 1987. Fauna cavernícola brasileira: composição e caracterização preliminar. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 3 (8): 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751986000400004

Trajano E. & Gnaspini-Netto P. 1991. Composição da fauna cavernícola brasileira, com uma análise preliminar da distribuição dos táxons. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 7 (3): 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751990000300017

Trajano E., Golovatch S.I., Geoffroy J.-J. Pinto-da-Rocha R. & Fontanetti C.S. 2000. Synopsis of brazilian cave-dwelling millipedes (Diplopoda). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 41 (18): 259–287.

Verhoeff K.W. 1894. Beiträge zur Anatomie und Systematik der Juliden. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 44: 137–162.

Verhoeff K.W. 1943. Ueber einige Diplopoden aus Minas Gerais (Brasilien). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 37: 249–288.

Viggiani V. 1973. Le specie descritte da Filippo Silvestri (1873–1949). Bollettino del Laboratorio di entomologia agraria “Filippo Silvestri” 30: 351–417.

Wesener T. & VandenSpiegel D. 2009. A first phylogenetic analysis of giant pill-millipedes (Diplopoda: Sphaerotheriida), a new model Gondwanan taxon, with special emphasis on island gigantism. Cladistics 25: 545–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00267.x

Wesener T., Enghoff H. & Wägele J.W. 2008. Pachybolini – A tribe of giant Afrotropical millipedes: arguments for monophyly and the description of a new genus from Madagascar (Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Pachybolidae). Invertebrate Systematics 22 (1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07008

Yamaguti H.Y. & Pinto-da-Rocha R. 2009. Taxonomic review of Bourguyiinae, cladistic analysis, and a new hypothesis of biogeographic relationships of the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest (Arachnida: Opiliones, Gonyleptidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166: 319–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00484.x

Published
2023-04-27
How to Cite
Iniesta, L. F. M., Bouzan, R. S., & Brescovit, A. D. (2023). A reassessment of the Neotropical genus Pseudonannolene Silvestri, 1895: cladistic analysis, biogeography, and taxonomic review (Spirostreptida: Pseudonannolenidae). European Journal of Taxonomy, 867(1), 1–312. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.867.2109
Section
Monograph